Answer:
Minh doesn't have to continue paying for the contract.
the law enacted by the military is called what
Onyango is employed by Tropical College in Nairobi as a driver while he was transporting some of the college students to the city centre after classes; His attention was diverted when he saw some girls playing netball in a field next to the road. He lost control of the bus which then landed in a ditch and Wafula one of the students aboard was injured. Wafula seeks your advice as to whether he should sue the college or Onyango for damages for negligence. What advice would you give Wafula?
Answer:
Wafula should sue the college
Explanation:
The college is responsible for keeping the student's safe atleast while they are still in the custody of the school. The college is also responsible for hiring drivers in whose hands the life of the students lies during transport. Therefore based on the narration given, which gives clear evidence showcasing negligence on the path of the driver. In other to forestall future occurence, the college should be sued for their driver's negligence being the employer. The college may decide to come up with more rigorous employment tests when hiring to forestall avoidable mistakes of this sort in the future.
What is the purpose of cross-examination during a trial?
O A. To convince the judge to deliver a verdict immediately
B. To summarize each side's arguments to the jury
C. To make witnesses look untrustworthy and suspicious
D. To give the jury a firsthand account of an incident
C. To make witnesses look untrustworthy and suspicious.
Cross-examination is used during a trial to test the witness's credibility and to create doubt.
Answer:
To make witnesses look untrustworthy and suspicious
Explanation:
Provision that authorizes payment to anyone fairly entitled to insurance proceeds only one to the insurance proceeds by reason of having incurred expenses
Provision that authorizes payment to anyone who is fairly entitled to the insurance proceeds because of having incurred expenses on behalf of the insured for medical treatment and/or burial
Answer:
Facility of Payment Clause
Explanation:
Facility of Payment Clause was formulated to prevent the need to nominate any of the administrator, executor, or guardian to obtain the insurance benefits, and then immediately fasten the settlement of disputes among rival claimants without the unnecessarily wasting time and going through litigation.
Hence, in this case, the right answer is Facility of Payment Clause
Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court lever is called
a/an?
Answer:
Trevor1984. Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court level is called an appeal
Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?
I.An agency relationship may be created through necessityII.All agents are entitled to be paid for their servicesIII. An agent may form a relationship between a third party and the principa
Answer:
II
Explanation:
All agent are entitled to be paid for their services
list two items you can do to keep a DWI off your record!
How far should you stop from The nearest railroad crossing if a flagger is warning of a upcoming train
Is monitoring employee’s online behavior by companies ethical? Should a company fire an employee if they find their information on social media detrimental to its image? ''
Answer:
With privacy laws put into place, it's not ethical for employers to view personal information through emails but is absolutely possible if need be, provided that the employer has a solid policy in place informing employees that no information sent or received on company equipment is private.
I personally don't believe that a company should fire an employee over a social media post UNLESS what they're doing is illegal or dangerous. However, employers can fire employees for anything, including their social media posts.
Bài 1: Công ty Cổ phần Tấn Tài đăng kí doanh nghiệp ngày 10/10/2015 với 3 cổ đông sáng lập là A, B, C. Công ty có vốn điều lệ là 1 tỷ và phát hành 100.000 cổ phiếu (mỗi cổ phần trị giá 10.000 đồng) trong đó cổ phần phổ thông 800 triệu, 50 triệu CPUD biểu quyết và 150 triệu CPUD cổ tức. Hỏi: a, A, B, C phải đăng kí mua ít nhất bao nhiêu cổ phần phổ thông. b, Ông Đức nắm giữ 10% cổ phần của công ty và muốn mua thêm cổ phần ưu đãi biểu quyết của công ty Tấn Tài. Yêu cầu trên có được không. C, Tháng 10/2019 ông A do không hài lòng với các chính sách của công ty nên đã chuyển nhượng các cổ phần của mình cho người khác. - Ông A có được chuyển nhượng không? Vì sao? - Nếu A chuyển nhượng hết thì hậu quả pháp lý đối với công ty Cổ phần Tấn Tài là gì?
Explanation:
get Garbrumeyjjethztjarhatjztjafnatmstbatnatntn
Which of the following BEST describes the “rule of four”?
A.
The Supreme Court uses the rule of four after they have heard a case to decide whether they will issue an opinion on the case.
B.
The Supreme Court uses the rule of four to determine whether a case will be granted a writ of certiorari.
C.
It refers to the number of votes required to make a majority decision on the Court.
D.
The rule of four refers to the number of justices it takes to form a minority opinion on a case
Answer:
i think its B
Explanation:
as a law enforcement officers, how you will handle a situation if a person with mental illness is involved?
If a person knowingly causes the death of another person after deliberation on the matter, that crime is termed
second degree murder.
first degree murder.
third degree murder.
fourth degree murder.
- First-degree murder
_____
First-degree murder is premeditated, and often times deliberated beforehand.
_____
- Second-degree: A second-degree murder refers to the unpremeditated, but intentional killing of another person.
- Third-degree: Less serious felonies; almost always eligible for a probationary sentence.
_"Fourth degree:" This is known as involuntary manslaugther; no intention to kill but a negligent or careless act leads to the death.
Protecting the crime scene helps in identifying
the suspect.
a wrongful death.
the cause of death.
the victim.
- the cause of death
By surveying the crime scene (that is intact), investigators are able to determine if the cause of death was due to the environment/surroundings.
Can i study law after 10 in nepal ?
Answer:
Ten Plus Two (+2) program in Law is a two years program offered by National Examination Board (NEB). If someone is seeking to start their career in the administrative/legal sector then a degree in Law provides the perfect platform for putting you on the right path.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
ookkokjshshhsjsjs
Drivers Ed confusing question
Answer:
T intersections
Explanation:
The T intersection is representing a 3 way sTop i hope this helps.
quá độ lên chủ nghĩa xã hội bỏ qua tư bản chủ nghĩa.
do you think your neighborhood is likely to have high or low rates of crime? Why?
The defendant wanted to borrow his neighbor's car to go shopping for lawnmowers. Knowing that the neighbor was out of town for the weekend, the defendant opened the neighbor's garage door and took a car key that the neighbor hid in an old coffee can for emergencies. Once inside, the defendant, mistakenly believing that larceny applied only to the taking of items valued at over $100, decided to take the neighbor's lawnmower (worth $75) in order to trade it in on a new mower. However, on the way to the store with the mower, he was involved in an automobile accident, totaling the car. In a common law jurisdiction, of what property is the defendant guilty of larceny
Answer:
In a common law jurisdiction, the property that the defendant is guilty of larceny is the lawnmower.
Explanation:
Larceny or theft is the intentional possession of someone's property for the purpose of permanently depriving the owner of its use. The property may be the person's identity, intellectual property, services, and personal property. Though the automobile was totally ruined, the neighbor did not initially intend to dispossess the owner of the car. But he intended to dispossess the owner of the lawnmower since he was about to trade it in for a new one, which will belong to him and not the former owner.
Samathahas a small business selling clothes. Because his shop is too small to store all his goods so he must hire a a warehouse. Each time that he took goods to the warehouse he was asked to sign an invoice which contained an exclusion clause stating that the warehouse owners were not liable for any damage to the goods. This invoice was put into effect inSeptember 2020, whereas thecontract had been agreedon July 2020. Oneday, Samatha came to take his clothes but realised that most of them were burneddue to a fire. As a result,he requiredthe warehouse owner to compenstate him and refuesedto pay for the storage. The warehouse owners brought action against him. Do the warehouse owners haveto be responsiblefor the loss?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
He Had Signed An Invoice Which Doesn't Hold The Warehouse Owners Responsible Even If They Did It.
A person who knowingly causes the death of another while committing a criminal act, but who did not act under the influence of sudden passion, has committed
second degree murder.
involuntary manslaughter.
voluntary manslaughter.
first degree murder.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its C. voluntary manslaughter
At trial in a criminal prosecution for theft, the defendant calls a witness to testify that he formerly knew the defendant as an army supply sergeant and that the defendant had turned down many opportunities for black marketeering.
Is the witness's testimony admissible?
Answer:
No. Should be no.
Explanation:
black marketeering has noting to do with prosecution because of theft.
BLACK MARKETEERING:
illegal traffic or trade in officially controlled commodities.
THEFT:
the physical removal of an object that is capable of being stolen without the consent of the owner and with the intention of depriving the owner of it permanently.
Black Marketeering pervention has nothing to do with stealing.
Which of the following stages in the criminal trial process winds up the trial proceedings?
opening statement
cross-examination
closing argument
direct examination
Answer:
option c
Explanation:
closing argument
Samatha has a small business selling clothes. Because his shop is too small to store all his goods so he must hire a warehouse. Each time that he took goods to the warehouse he was asked to sign an invoice which contained an exclusion clause stating that the warehouse owners were not liable for any damage to the goods. This invoice was put into effect in September 2020, whereas the contract had been agreed on July 2020. One day, Samatha came to take his clothes but realised that most of them were burned due to a fire. As a result, he required the warehouse owner to compenstate him and refuesed to pay for the storage. The warehouse owners brought action against him.
Question Completion:
Do the warehouse owners have to be responsible for the loss?
Answer:
Samatha Vs Warehouse Owners
Legally, the warehouse owners are not liable for the loss. Through a series of previous dealings, the contract terms were restated or amended using the exclusion clause on the invoice, which Samatha signed.
Samatha should have been aware that exclusion clauses lessen contractual liabilities, and if he had continued to sign the invoices bearing the exclusion clause without objection, then he had consented to the exclusion.
Therefore, the warehouse owners are entitled to payment for warehouse storage, and Samatha has lost his right to claim compensation for the damage to his warehoused goods.
Explanation:
According to the Uniform Commercial Code, a series of previous conduct between Samatha and the Warehouse owners may create a common basis for understanding and interpreting the amendment of the underlying contract. For example, an exclusion clause can be introduced in the contract through previous dealings.
ANY COLLEGE STUDENT KNOW HOW EXAMITY WORKS?
Answer:
chill with the caps and uhh no
Explanation:
How are members of house committees determined?
Explanation:
Each of the committee is determined at the beginning of the Congress
Why does it keep taking money from me I don't even use this app it's taking my money and I want it back
Answer:
1dk im sorry :(
Explanation:
A rock band was about to begin a grueling four-month world tour. The band's manager telephoned a massage therapist and said that he would like to reward the band for all their hard work on the tour by booking massages for all of the band members immediately after the last show in the tour. The therapist agreed to perform the massages at a deeply discounted rate because she secretly was a devoted fan of the band and excited to have the opportunity to meet the band members. Just before the first scheduled performance, the band's singer developed a rare throat infection, and as a result, the band had to cancel the tour at great expense. The manager notified the massage therapist that her services would not be needed. The therapist objected and demanded that the manager arrange for her to perform the massages for the band at a different time.
a. Is there a contract?
b. Was it breached?
Answer:
a. There is a contract between the band manager and the massage thereapist because the elements of a contract (mutual assent, expressed by a valid offer and acceptance; adequate consideration; capacity; and legality) are fully satisfied. However, it is a conditional contract. The condition for executing the contract was missing as a result of the occurrence of the unforeseen event.
b. The contract was not breached. It was frustrated because an unforeseen event occurred and prevented the contract from being performed as agreed. The band manager can still rearrange the massages to be performed at a different time.
Explanation:
Though the massage therapist heavily discounted the rate of the massages, there is still adequate consideration because she was using the opportunity to satisfy her excitement to meet the band members while at the same time collecting some fees for her work. A contract may be frustrated with the occurrence of an unforeseen event after the contract is entered, especially when the event is not within the control of the parties as in this case.
mọi quy tắc xử sự tồn tại tròn xã hội có nhà nước đều là pháp luật đúng hay sai? Giải thích
Answer:
Sai lầm
Explanation:
Mọi quy tắc xử sự tồn tại trong xã hội có nhà nước đều là pháp luật.
Sai. Các quan hệ xã hội của chúng ta được điều chỉnh bơi các quy phạm đao đức và các quy phạm pháp luật, mà các quy phạm đạo đức thì có thể đượec thể chế hóa và đưa lên thành các quy phạm pháp luật nhưng không phải quy phạm đạo đức nào cũng được dưa lên thành luật cả. Tồn tại xã hội quyết định ý thức xã hội cho nên các quy tắc ứng xử đựoc coi là các chuẩn mực đạo đứa đó đó không nhất thiết phải được xem là pháp luật mà nó song song tồn tại trong xã hội
Need help with drivers Ed question
Answer:
It is a two way road
Explanation:
Traffic circles are generally two lanes going in, two lanes coming around and two lanes exiting the circle
Answer:
it's a two-way road I'm pretty sure
