his Stem-and-Leaf Plot represents the heights of the students on Ralph's basketball team. One student’s height is missing from the plot. If the mean height of all the students on the team is 63 inches, what is the missing height?

A. 58 in.
B. 62 in.
C. 67 in.
D. 71 in.

Answer:

It allowed trade with Mexico, Canada, and Asia.

Explanation:

the increases trade properties one

Answer is the civil right act

The civil rights act

Answer:

Answer:D Though all citizens were equal, only the wealthy and well-born were likely to serve as jurors or council members.

Answer:

The Answer Is In

The Pic

Explanation:

Answer:

C . IAEA

Explanation:

Because it stand for The International Atomic Energy Agency which promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy, and to inhibit its use for any military purpose, including nuclear weapons.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

ok

Answer: C (I think)

Can I have brainliest??

C
explanation : I took this test

Answer: Provided mountain-free land for railroad construction

Provided mountain-free land for railroad construction. I.e. the first railroad that went across the country.

Answer: B

Explanation:

Women weren’t allowed to vote until the 1900s

Answer:

B. Voters must be female.

Explanation:

Women did not have the right to vote during this time period until the 19th Amendment changed Americans' rights and granted all women the right to vote.

Answer:

The fungus may be endangering non-native palm trees, but that doesnt mean it wont spread to native ones. Even though the palms arent native to that area, they could spread to the native palm trees and start killing those as well. Also, the fungus could completely kill off the non-native population, or it could spread to where those palm trees are native. If it spreads to the palm tree's actual home, it could spell the end for that species of palm tree.

I hope this helps!

This is one of the correct possibilities

1. They were highly skilled architects who created structures with great precision. Such as the pyramids

2. Mayan Medicine was surprisingly advanced. They were skillful dental surgeons and made prostheses from jade and turquoise and filled teeth with iron pyrite.

Developed the science of astronomy as well as calendars and hieroglyphics of their own language.
As well as made a unique structures such as temples and pyramids.

Explanation:

The development of such major Sudanic kingdoms and empires as Ghana, Mali, Songhai, the Hausa states, and Kanem-Bornu along the southern fringes of the Sahara had a number of important consequences for the history of western Africa as a whole

The precise term Sacrum Romanum Imperium dates only from 1254, though the term Holy Empire reaches back to 1157, and the term Roman Empire was used from 1034 to denote the lands under Conrad II’s rule. The term “Roman emperor” is older, dating from Otto II (died 983). This title, however, was not used by Otto II’s predecessors, from Charlemagne (or Charles I) to Otto I, who simply employed the phrase imperator augustus (“august emperor”) without any territorial adjunct. The first title that Charlemagne is known to have used, immediately after his coronation in 800, is “Charles, most serene Augustus, crowned by God, great and pacific emperor, governing the Roman empire.” This clumsy formula, however, was soon discarded.

Holy Roman Empire
Holy Roman Empire
Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire, 10th century; in the treasury of Hofburg palace, Vienna.
Erich Lessing/Magnum
These questions about terms reveal some of the problems involved in the nature and early history of the empire. It can be regarded as a political institution, or approached from the point of view of political theory, or treated in the context of the history of Christendom as the secular counterpart of a world religion. The history of the empire is also not to be confused or identified with the history of its constituent kingdoms, Germany and Italy, though clearly they are interrelated. The constituent territories retained their identity; the emperors, in addition to the imperial crown, also wore the crowns of their kingdoms. Finally, whereas none of the earlier emperors from Otto I had assumed the imperial title until actually crowned by the pope in Rome, after Charles V none was emperor in this sense, though all laid claim to the imperial dignity as if they had been duly crowned as well as elected. Despite these anomalies and others, the empire, at least in the Middle Ages, was by common assent, along with the papacy, the most important institution of western Europe.


Theologians, lawyers, popes, ecclesiastics, rulers, rebels like Arnold of Brescia and Cola di Rienzo, literary figures like Dante and Petrarch, and the practical men, members of the high nobility, on whom the emperors relied for support, all saw the empire in a different light and had their own ideas of its origin, function, and justification. Among these heterogeneous and often incompatible views, three may be said to predominate: (1) the papal theory, according to which the empire was the secular arm of the church, set up by the papacy for its own purposes and therefore answerable to the pope and, in the last resort, to be disposed of by him; (2) the imperial, or Frankish, theory, which placed greater emphasis on conquest and hegemony as the source of the emperor’s power and authority and according to which he was responsible directly to God; and (3) the popular, or Roman, theory (the “people” at this stage being synonymous with the nobility and in this instance with the Roman nobility), according to which the empire, following the tradition of Roman law, was a delegation of powers by the Roman people. Of the three theories the last was the least important; it was evidently directed against the pope, whose constitutive role it implicitly denied, but it was also a specifically Italian reaction against the predominance in practice of Frankish and German elements.

Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content.
Subscribe Now
It is also important to distinguish between the universalist and localist conceptions of the empire, which have been the source of considerable controversy among historians. According to the former, the empire was a universal monarchy, a “commonwealth of the whole world, whose sublime unity transcended every minor distinction”; and the emperor “was entitled to the obedience of Christendom.” According to the latter, the emperor had no ambition for universal dominion; his policy was limited in the same way as that of every other ruler, and when he made more far-reaching claims his object was normally to ward off the attacks either of the pope or of the Byzantine emperor. According to this view, also, the origin of the empire is to be explained by specific local circumstances rather than by far-flung theories.

Load Next Page
Hope this helps !

Answer:

The Battle of Lepanto has a major place in the symbolism of the Western-Islamic relationship, The Story of the Battle of Lepanto treats the battle as a major encounter between the Islamic Ottoman empire and the forces of Western Christendom.

Explanation:

The battle marked the first significant victory for a Christian naval force over a Turkish fleet and the climax of the age of galley warfare in the Mediterranean.