Answer:
Uh bro? We don't have your link.
Explanation:
2.
Why did Andrew Jackson dislike John C. Calhoun?
Answer:
Why did Andrew Jackson hate John C Calhoun?
Jackson came to blame Calhoun for the situation, accusing him of treachery and initiating an angry correspondence that severed social relations between the two men. This situation allowed Martin Van Buren to win favor with Jackson and ultimately replace Calhoun as vice president in the 1832 election
Explanation:
was the US justified in dropping the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima, Japan and Nagasaki, Japan?
∵∴∵answer∵∴∵
no, in my opinion they were not justified
∵∴∵description∵∴∵
in order to say the US justified in dropping the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima, Japan, and Nagasaki, Japan you need to say any action justifies taking human life I do not believe that is for me to decide
although some would make the point of counteraction for pearl harbor even in this case the bombs were a huge counteraction.
in the end, the bombs were nothing but a strategic move to ens the war quickly
/.) (.\
/)\| |/(\
//)/ hope this helps -Tom \(\\
/'"^" "^"`\
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
In order to say the US justified in dropping the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima, Japan, and Nagasaki, Japan you need to say any action justifies taking human life I do not believe that is for me to decide. Although some would make the point of counteraction for pearl harbor even in this case the bombs were a huge counteraction. In the end, the bombs were nothing but a strategic move to ens the war quickly
What was the New Deal?
FDR's plan to help the country recover from the Great Depression
A new way for citizens to gain credit
A method of repaying those who lost their jobs
Another name for the Stock Market crash of 1929
Answer:
FDR's plan to help the country recover from the Great Depression.
Explanation:
President Franklin. D. Roosevelt brought forth the New Deal as a way to tackle and solve the problems brought by the Great Depression. It was this New Deal that brought about significant changes and revival of means of living in the people.
FDR's New Deal was initially brought to deal with the problems such as unemployment, overproduction of agricultural produces, in short, help tackle the financial crisis of the nation. And it was this deal that revived the nation's economy and helped bring afresh a sense of hope among the people.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
All of the following were considered Japanese
assets in the U.S. EXCEPT which one?
A. Japanese-American citizens
B. Japanese money in the U.S.
C. Japanese businesses in U.S.
D. U.S. Japanese bank accounts
All of the following were considered Japanese assets in the U.S. except Japanese-American citizens. Option (a) is correct.
What do you mean by Citizen?A citizen is someone who has been given full rights and obligations as a member of a country or political community either by their place of birth, the nationality of one or both parents, or by naturalization.
The treaty stipulated that Japan would defend stranded sailors and make Shimoda and Hakodate ports available for American ships to refuel and replenish. Additionally, Japan granted the United States the authority to name consuls to reside in certain port cities, a privilege that had not before been extended to foreign countries.
Japan launched a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, decimating the US Pacific Fleet in the process. Days later, after Germany and Italy attacked the US, America found itself at the center of a world conflict. Top Image: After the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Office of War Information created a propaganda poster.
Therefore, Option (a) is correct. Except Japanese-American citizens all of the following were considered Japanese assets in the U.S.
Learn more about Citizen, here;
https://brainly.com/question/455363
#SPJ2
In what program was the Red Guard created and what was their mission?
Answer:
Red Guards, Chinese (Pinyin) Hongweibing or (Wade-Giles romanization) Hung-Wei-Ping, in Chinese history, groups of militant university and high school students formed into paramilitary units as part of the Cultural Revolution (1966–76). These young people often wore green jackets similar to the uniforms of the Chinese army at the time, with red armbands attached to one of the sleeves. They were formed under the auspices of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 1966 to help party chairman Mao Zedong combat “revisionist” authorities—i.e., those party leaders Mao considered as being insufficiently revolutionary. Mao was thus making a bid to regain control of the CCP from his colleagues, but the Red Guards who responded in August 1966 to his summons fancied themselves as new revolutionary rebels pledged to eliminating all remnants of the old culture in China, as well as purging all supposedly bourgeois elements within the government. Several million Red Guards journeyed to Beijing to meet with Mao in eight massive demonstrations late in 1966, and the total number of Red Guards throughout the country may have reached 11 million at some point.
While engaging in marches, meetings, and frenzied propagandizing, Red Guard units attacked and persecuted local party leaders as well as schoolteachers and school officials, other intellectuals, and persons of traditional views. Several hundred thousand people died in the course of these persecutions. By early 1967 Red Guard units were overthrowing existing party authorities in towns, cities, and entire provinces. These units soon began fighting among themselves, however, as various factions vied for power amidst each one’s claims that it was the true representative of Maoist thought. The Red Guards’ increasing factionalism and their total disruption of industrial production and Chinese urban life caused the government in 1967–68 to urge the Red Guards to retire into the countryside. The Chinese military was called in to restore order throughout the country, and from this point, the Red Guard movement gradually subsided.
On a scale of 1-5 with 1 being very difficult and 5 being really easy, how difficult did you find the document based short essay? Explain your response
Read the US Bill of Rights. Then, compare the US Bill of Rights to the Declaration of Rights of the 1842 Choctaw Constitution. How are the two texts similar? How are they different?
Answer:
With its more positive tone the Texas Bill of Rights provides much the same protections as the U.S. Bill of Rights. But it also extends beyond federal protections. For example, Sec. 3a explicitly forbids discrimination based on sex, race, color, creed, or national origin.
Explanation:
In many ways, the Texas Bill of Rights offers the same protections as the American Bill of Rights. It still does, however, go beyond constitutional benefits.
What is a constitution?A constitution is a fundamental document that defines rules and regulations, laws and legislation as well as the power and authority of the government to conduct the functioning of any country.
The English Bill of Rights constrained governmental power and gave citizens more freedoms, enabling them to express themselves freely and engage in free speech.
There were minimal personal liberties guaranteed under the Constitution, which focused primarily on the composition of the government.
The Bill of Rights, which is made up of the first ten amendments of the Constitution, was where they were instead set down afterward.
Learn more about Constitution, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ2
What was the name (full name, not abbreviation) of Vladimir Lenin's policy for fixing Russia's economy? What type of business did it allow?
Answer:
Introduced by Vladimir Lenin in 1921, the New Economic Policy (or NEP) was a radical shift in Bolshevik economic strategy. It eased the harsh restrictions of war communism, the Bolshevik economic policy during the Civil War, and allowed the return of markets and petty trade.Jun 18, 2019
Union
civilians
Confederate
civilians
?
Wealthy
citizens did
not have to
serve in the
military.
Ordinary
citizens
struggled to
get enough
food.
A. Large cities were constantly attacked by enemy forces.
B. Food shortages led to riots in cities.
C. Factory and business owners became very wealthy.
D. New currency led to high prices for consumer goods.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I took the test
hope this helps! :)
Explain why Roosevelt's New Deal laws were called "alphabet soup."
Answer:
Progressive politicians saw their wildest dreams come alive. The Great Depression created an environment where the federal government accepted responsibility for curing a wide array of society's ills previously left to individuals, states, and local governments. This amount of regulation and involvement requires a vast upgrading of the government bureaucracy. An armada of government bureaus and regulatory agencies was erected to service the programs of the New Deal. Collectively, observers called them the "ALPHABET AGENCIES."
Why do you think that the middle East had a monopoly of the species and why were they so desirable to the Europeans
( No links) please help
Explanation:
The first form of perfume was incense, first made by the Mesopotamians about 4000 years ago. Perfume enjoyed huge success during the seventeenth century, especially in France. In England perfumes were used extensively during the reigns of Henry VIII and Queen Elizabeth I. Chanel No5 was the first perfume created by applying modern chemical principles. Eau de cologne, usually used by men, was invented by an Italian barber in the beginning of the 18th century. The first stage in making a perfume.I really didn't know the answer of this cauz...i did not encounter this some kind of topic or lesson ...Will Im just a high school student , so maybe I still encounter this in the future.
I just made a research on it and summarize it all .
I hope this is correct .
What was the Ghost Dance movement?
A political movement started by homesteaders
A political movement started by the Plains tribes
A religious movement started by the Plains tribes
A religious movement started by white homesteaders
Answer:
The correct answer is C
Explanation:
Took the assignment
Have a good day
Answer:
c
Explanation:
edge 2021
At the time of Hitler's 1939 invasion of Poland, the US had a policy of
Answer:
the us had a policy of appeasement
Which of these wars is said to have
encouraged the use of Heroin in the
United States?
A. Korean War
B. Vietnam War
C. Gulf War
15points!! Help
Answer:
b) vietnamise war
Explanation:
Vietnam War encouraged the use of Heroin in the United States. Hence, option B is appropriate.
What is the Vietnam War?Between 1 November 1955 and 30 April 1975, when Saigon fell, there was a conflict in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia known as the Vietnam War. Officially, North Vietnam and South Vietnam engaged in the second of the Indochina Wars.
The Vietnam War was a protracted conflict between nationalist forces seeking to unite Vietnam under a communist regime and American forces working with South Vietnamese support to stop the rise of communism.
In March 1975, North Vietnamese forces launched a significant offensive in the Central Highlands after reorganizing their units and modernizing their supply infrastructure. The battle was finally put to an end on April 30, 1975, when NVA tanks rolled through the Saigon Presidential Palace's gate.
Hence, option B is correct.
Learn more about the Vietnam War here:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ2
Why was letting seawater evaporate in the sun not an sufficient, or good, method for obtaining salt?
How are subsidies similar to tariffs?
A. Both are types of taxes.
B. Both aim to lower the price of domestic goods.
C. Both try to raise the price of imported goods.
D. Both aim to disadvantage imports .
Answer: a. Both aim to disadvantage imports
Explanation:
Subsidies are given to companies in order to boost their production and reduce prices of goods.
Tariffs are taxes on imported goods. This raises the prices of the imports. The importance of both subsidies and tariffs is that both of them is to discourage imports and protect the local industries.
Answer:
D, both aim to disadvantage imports.
Explanation:
plzzzzzzz help for a brainly
What was "Operation Rolling Thunder" and why was it a big change in American strategy in the war?
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
"Operation Rolling Thunder" was the codename given to the United States' strategy or action of using massive bombs during the Vietnam war in 1965.
It was a significant change in American strategy in the war because it increased military pressure on North Vietnam's communist leaders, affecting their military capacity to continue fighting against South Vietnam, whom the United States supports.
It was recorded that the United States used about 643,000 bombs, and the financial cost of the bomb effect to North Vietnam is about 300 million dollars.
Political science is the study of politics at the ___ level(s). (Check all that apply.)
A) local
B) international
C) national
D) state
plzzzzzzz help for a brianley
Answer:
William the Conqueror
Explanation:
Answer:
William the Conqueror was crowded
President Jefferson did not favor building large seagoing ship because
Answer:
he believed the Navy should only protect the American coastline.
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
what is price-fixing?
Answer:price fixing is an agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price is maintained at a given level by controlling supply and demand
Explanation:hope I helped:)
Do u guys know the right on?
Which of the following events led most directly to the collapse of the Soviet union the invasion of chechyan
Answer:
Explanation:
With the end of the Cold War, both the United States and Russia are in a position to use force more selectively and with less risk. Absent a global superpower rivalry, neither feels the same compulsion to intervene almost everywhere to protect or secure a competitive advantage. At the same time, intervention almost anywhere is now safer because there is no danger of escalation to apocalyptic levels. Despite these similarities, however, the differences in the respective post-Cold War security circumstances of the two countries are more striking than the similarities and have weighed more heavily in their intervention decisionmaking.
The end of the Cold War and the collapse of Soviet Communism left the United States as the world's only superpower—a status that, for some Americans, entailed a responsibility to create a "new world order," if need be by periodic resorts to force to curb regional instability. In contrast, post-Soviet Russia emerged from the disintegration of the old order with a sharply reduced international power position and an extended zone of instability along its southern and western flanks, as well as with internal threats to its own territorial integrity. In consequence, Russia has used force exclusively within the former Soviet Union, while the United States has intervened in Europe, Africa, the Caribbean, and Central America.
At the same time that differences in power and reach between Russia and the United States have become more pronounced, the institutional and procedural differences between them have diminished as a result of Russia's slow but continuing democratization. How far this process of convergence has gone in the area of intervention and force employment decisionmaking is one of the central issues examined in the concluding chapter of this book. The earlier chapters present case studies of nine instances of regional military intervention undertaken by the two countries since 1991, and one analogous case study from the late Cold War era—of American peacekeeping in Lebanon in 1982–1984. For the United States, in addition to the intervention in Lebanon, these case studies cover the former Yugoslavia, Panama, Haiti, and Africa, as well as a cross-cutting look at how the Bush administration approached its intervention and force employment decisionmaking. For Russia, the case studies describe the decision-making process that led to the use of force in Ossetia-Ingushetia, Trans-Dniestria, Tadjikistan, Abkhazia, and Chechnya.
These case studies are, first and foremost, descriptive in that they revisit events chronologically and highlight the issues at stake, as well as the interplay of individuals and institutions that accounted for the flow of events. However, they are written from an analytic perspective with a view to the formulation of useful generalizations about the decision-making practices of the two countries. Their value as inputs to such an undertaking is enhanced by the fact that their authors were either direct participants in or first-hand observers of the events described.
A word is in order about one important unexamined case: Operation Desert Storm, which provides an all but prototypical example of "mature" intervention decisionmaking with respect to such key considerations as objectives planning, consensus-building, coalition formation, and operational discipline. It has been excluded from consideration here because the force employed was quantitatively and qualitatively different by several orders of magnitude from that employed in all other post-Cold War instances.
Since most of the interventions described below have not previously been subjected to detailed analysis from a decision-making perspective, this volume should fill an important gap in the scholarly literature on post-Cold War crisis interventions. Hopefully, it will also provide Russian and American policymakers with a better understanding of how decisions on security issues are made in the other's country. If so, it may help not only to avert misunderstandings but also to strengthen cooperative security relations between the two countries. Nuclear issues excepted, neither country is a pivotal factor in the other's security planning today. This may not be true in the future, however, and now is certainly an appropriate time to capitalize on unprecedented opportunities to forge close links between security analysts and practitioners in the two countries and to break down barriers of ignorance and mistrust that could complicate bilateral relations and prevent the emergence of a meaningful security partnership.
Section One: Russian Cases
Chapter 1: Ossetia-Ingushetia
by Alan Ch. Kasaev [1]
Lawmakers and courts work to protect citizens’ right to free speech. However, that’s also the job of Texas citizens. By attending peaceful gatherings, writing opinions and speaking publicly, Texans help to protect their rights. Write a short paragraph explaining how you can choose to express the right of free speech in your daily life.
Answer:
freedom of expression is a fundamental human right. it reinforces all other human rights, allowing society to develop and progress. the ability to express our opinion and speak freely is essential to bring change to society
Answer:
Explanation:
freedom of expression is a fundamental human right. it reinforces all other human rights, allowing society to develop and progress. the ability to express our opinion and speak freely is essential to bring change to society
After World War
how did new theories about science differ from past ideas?
© New theories emphasized using technology to find answers.
New theories recognized that explanations were not always possible.
O New theories aimed to provide hope through science.
New theories reflected changes that were happening in society at large.
Answer:
After World War I, new theories about science differ from past ideas by reflecting changes that were happening in society at large. World War I is seen as a time where world had suffered great loss in terms of life as well as resources but this was also a time in the history where humanity saw great technological and scientific advancement.
Explanation:
I hope this helps you
Sorry if I get it wrong:(
After World War 1 the new theories about science differ from past ideas in the way that the new theories reflected changes that were happening in society at large. Thus option (D) is correct.
What was World War I?World War I was a major global conflict from 1914 to 1918. It involved the major powers of Europe, along with the United States and several other nations, and was fought primarily in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
The Treaty of Versailles, signed in 1919, officially ended the war and imposed significant penalties on Germany, including the payment of large reparations, the loss of territory, and the restriction of its military.
The new theories reflected changes that were happening in society at large is the way that the new theories about science differ from past ideas after World War. Therefore option (D) is correct.
Learn more about World War I here:
https://brainly.com/question/30066547
#SPJ5
According to the author, the distinction between political, economic, and non-governmental institutions "isn’t always very neat." What are some of the ways in which these institutions overlap?
(kahn academy)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the article, the name of it, or the author. Without this information, we do not know what the content is.
However, although you forgot to attach the text, we did some deep research and can comment on the following. Probably, you are referring to the article written by school teacher Emman L. Elshaikh, about international political institutions.
To the author, the distinction between political, economic, and non-governmental institutions "isn’t always very neat." Some of the ways in which these institutions overlap are in that their functions many times are not clearly defined in their reach, objectives, and allocation of money exclusively to serve the interests for what they were created, and many times these institutions are used for different purposes to serve the political and economic interests of powerful and dominant nations.
The author refers to the case of the role of the League of Nations when it was created after World War I. Or the beginning of the United Nations (UN), at the end of World War II.
The author cites the role of international non-governmental organizations in different places and the appearance of global economic institutions as the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank, as powerful institutions that exert pressure over many countries and their economic policies.
What were some other places racism took place in other than there south?
Answer:
Everywhere
Explanation:
The main trial court in the federal system is the
O )
1) Court of Civil Appeals
O2) Circuit Court of Appeals
3) Court of Criminal Appeals
4) District Court
Answer:District Courts
Explanation:The federal court system has three main levels: district courts (the trial court), circuit courts which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, the final level of appeal in the federal system.
Advances in transportation technologies aided in the spread of industrialization.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
T
F
Answer:
true(☞ﾟヮﾟ)☞☜(ﾟヮﾟ☜)
Explanation:
