During a particularly dry growing season in a southern state, farmers noticed that there is a delicate balance between the number of seeds that are planted per square foot and the yield of the crop in pounds per square foot. The yields were the smallest when the number of seeds per square foot was either very small or very large.

What is the explanatory variable for this relationship?

yield of the crop
location of the farm
precipitation for the growing season
number of seeds planted per square foot

I think it's (D).
number of seeds planted per sf

Answer:

this is an equation of closure property of rational numbers under addition

Step-by-step explanation:

this is the meaning of it

for every a and b belongs to q then a+b belongs to q

Answer:

A and B must always be congruent

B and D

E and G

F and H

Step-by-step explanation:

I have to be honest. from the picture I cannot see the vertical angles. All I see is a straight blue line and red letters. But based on the vertical theorem

A and B must always be congruent

B and D

E and G

F and H

also if you want to make sure it's right try to include another picture.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

edmentum :)

Answer:

This statement would be true.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

80 numbers

Step-by-step explanation:

(6 - 2(because when the hundreds is 5 or 6, it will higher than 500)) x 5 x 4 = 80

Step-by-step explanation:

I do hope that you understand through the steps in the attachment, if not kindly reach out!

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of all of them will result in 180. 15x-45=180. x=15. P=55, Q=70 and R=55. It's an isosceles triangle

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

its b

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  B) (4,–1)

Step-by-step explanation:

A graph can help you figure this out. The point (4, -1) is in the doubly-shaded area, so is a solution to this system.

==========================================================

Explanation:

Choice A can be ruled out because

[tex]y \le x+1\\\\5 \le 0+1\\\\5 \le 1\\\\[/tex]

which is false.

Choices C and D are similar, so they can be ruled out as well.

---------------------

Choice B is the answer because it makes both inequalities true.

If we plug the coordinates of (4,-1) into the first inequality, we get

[tex]y > -x\\\\-1 > -4[/tex]

which is a true statement because -1 is to the right of -4 on the number line.

Now try the other inequality

[tex]y \le x+1\\\\-1 \le 4+1\\\\-1 \le 5\\\\[/tex]

that's true also. So again, (4,-1) makes both inequalities true, and that's why choice B is the answer.

Answer:

C- 35 °

Step-by-step explanation:

Interior angle adjacent to 90° angle = 90° (supplementary angles of a line segment).

Interior angle adjacent to 125° angle = 55° (supplementary angles of a line segment).

Sum of two interior angles of the triangle = 55+90 = 145°

∠p = 180° - 145° = 35°

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a parallelogram is

A = bh where b is the base and h is the height

140 = b*10

Divide each side by 10

140/10 = 10b/10

14 = b

Answer:

0.8333

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

Mean, X = 100

Lower Specification Limit, LSL = 100 - 10 = 90

Upper Specification Limit, USL = 100 + 10 = 110

Standard Deviation, σ = 4

The process capability index, Cpk;

Cpk = Min[(X - LSL) / 3σ; (USL - X) /3σ]

Cpk = Min[(100 - 90) / 12 ; (110 - 100 ) /12]

Cpk = Min [0.8333 ; 0.8333]

Hence, Cpk = 0.8333

Answer:

all of the above

Step-by-step explanation:

the ratio between the flour, the baking soda, and the salt would = 1:1:2 (disregarding tsp or cup measurements, since all the units stay the same in the choices)

so really, all the answers are correct

hope this helps!

Answer:

B. 1/2 teaspoon of salt per 1 teaspoon of baking soda.

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio of cups of flour to tsp. of baking soda to tsp. of salt shown above is:

1/2 : 1/2 : 1/4

An equivalent rate to the ratio of tsp. of salt to tsp. of baking soda is 1/2 : 1 because:

Ratio of tsp. of salt to tsp. of baking soda is:

1/4 : 1/2

If we were to find an equivalent rate to this, it would be 1/2 teaspoon of salt per 1 teaspoon of baking soda for:

Multiply 2 to both terms in the ratio 1/4 : 1/2:

1/4 x 2 = 1/2 (simplified)

1/2 x 2 = 1 (simplified)

The new ratio is 1/2 : 1, which also represents the rate 1/2 teaspoon of salt per 1 teaspoon of baking soda.

Hope this helps!

Please comment back if this was correct.

Answer:

how long will it take before your investment is wort$6000?

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

in my point of view, my choice is C (asking the customer how the shirt was damaged) because when he finds out the reason why the shirt was damaged, he will explain whether or not that fault is in the store's return policy

another reason:

A) stopping the customers when they are talking, it's impolite behavior and i ensure that that customer will feel disatified.

B) i guess that customer doesnt waste of time because it

D) a full refund without finding the reason, i dont think it's a good idea

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Prove that all sides are congruent and that the slopes of consecutive sides are opposite reciprocals. Step-by-step explanation: In order to two segmets to be perpendicular, the slope of both lines must be opposite and reciprocals, having a 90° interception and forming a square.

Answer:

Isaac is 26

Simon is 24

if 8 is 4 I.e 8 divide by 4 is 2

therefore 1 minute is 2 scores

Isaac :13 x 2=26

(do the same to Simon to get his score)

Answer:

40 per minute.

Step-by-step explanation:

360/9=40

Answer:

-3/8 is located on the right of -1

Step-by-step explanation:

-3/8 is left of -1 because -3/8 is larger than -1.

Answer:

70% IS THE ANSWER

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope I helped.

Answer:

70%

Step-by-step explanation

0.7×100=70

Answer:

The appropriate null hypothesis is [tex]H_0: p = 0.25[/tex]

The appropriate alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_1: p < 0.25[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Exactly a year prior to this poll, in June of 2004, it was estimated that roughly 1 out of every 4 U.S. adults believed (at that time) that the war in Iraq was the most important problem facing the country.

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is still the same, that is, of [tex]\frac{1}{4} = 0.25[/tex]. So

[tex]H_0: p = 0.25[/tex]

We would like to test whether the 2005 poll provides significant evidence that the proportion of U.S. adults who believe that the war in Iraq is the most important problem facing the U.S. has decreased since the prior poll.

Decreased, so at the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if the proportion is less than 0.25, that is:

[tex]H_1: p < 0.25[/tex]

Answer:              It would be the first equation because:

Step-by-step explanation:        

In order to be an exponential function, the X

variable has to be in the exponent, that eliminates

the second and fourth answers

       f(X) = 4(3)X

using the point (2,36)

  f(2) = 4 (3)2

         = 4 (9 )

         = 36

The equation which represents an exponential function is f ( x ) = 4 ( 3 )ˣ

When you raise a quotient to a power you raise both the numerator and the denominator to the power. When you raise a number to a zero power you'll always get 1. Negative exponents are the reciprocals of the positive exponents.

The different Laws of exponents are:

mᵃ×mᵇ = mᵃ⁺ᵇ

mᵃ / mᵇ = mᵃ⁻ᵇ

( mᵃ )ᵇ = mᵃᵇ

mᵃ / nᵃ = ( m / n )ᵃ

m⁰ = 1

m⁻ᵃ = ( 1 / mᵃ )

Given data ,

Let the exponential equation be represented as A

Now , the value of A is

Let the point on the graph be P ( 2 , 36 )

So , when x = 2 , the value of y = 36

f ( x ) = 4 ( 3 )ˣ   be equation (1)

when x = 2

f ( 2 ) = 4 ( 3 )²

f ( 2 ) = 4 x 9

f ( 2 ) = 36

Hence , the exponential equation is f ( x ) = 4 ( 3 )ˣ

To learn more about exponents click :

https://brainly.com/question/28966438

#SPJ7

Answer:

you didn't feature any graphs for me to choose from

Answer:

x- 1

y-5

z-3

Step-by-step explanation:

all u have to do is calculate the distance, so for example y is 5 because - -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 and that is a 5 number distance

Answer:

C(M) = 0.65*M + 22.55

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that the cost to rent and drive for M miles is given by:

S(M) = 0.40*M + 17.75

And the insurance, also a function of M, is given by:

I(M) = 0.25*M + 4.80

We want to find the equation of the total cost for a rental that includes insurance.

This would be just the sum of the two above functions:

C(M) = S(M) + I(M)

C(M) = (0.40*M + 17.75) + (0.25*M + 4.80)

Now we just need to simplify this:

Taking M as a common factor, we get:

C(M) = (0.40 + 0.25)*M + 17.75 + 4.80

C(M) = 0.65*M + 22.55

Then the total cost equation, as a function of M, is given by:

C(M) = 0.65*M + 22.55

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Because it'll be 1²+2×1-3=0

And -3²+2(-3)-3=9-6-3=0

So it's impossible

Answer:

1.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Constant of proportionality refers to the slope of the line in this case, the slope of the line is (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)=(6-0)/(4-0)=1.5

Answer:

CI 90% = ( 0.227 ; 0.273)

Step-by-step explanation:

Information from the survey:

sample size   n = 938

number of people with yes answer  x = 235

proportion of people  p = 235/938

p = 0.25    then  q = 1 - 0.25    q = 0.75

Confidence Interval 90 % .

CI 90% = ( p ± SE )

CI 90% = ( p ± z(c)*√(p*q)/n)

CI 90 %   then significance level is  α = 10 %   α/2 = 5%

α/2 = 0.05  we find in z-table z (c) = 1.64

√(p*q)/n  = √0.25*0.75/938

√(p*q)/n  = √0.000199

√(p*q)/n  = 0.014

CI 90% = ( p ± z(c)*√(p*q)/n)

CI 90% = ( 0.25 ± 1.64*0.014)

CI 90% = ( 0.25 ± 0.023 )

CI 90% = ( 0.227 ; 0.273)