SOMEONE ANSWER THIS PLSSSS


Jack jogs and rides his bike for a total of 75 minutes every day. He rides his bike for 15 minutes longer than he jogs.

Part A: Write a pair of linear equations to show the relationship between the number of minutes Jack jogs (x) and the number of minutes he rides his bike (y) every day. (5 points)

Part B: How much time does Jack spend jogging every day? Show your work. (3 points)

Part C: Is it possible for Jack to have spent 60 minutes riding his bike if he jogs and rides for a total of exactly 75 minutes and rides his bike for 15 minutes longer than he jogs? Explain your reasoning. (2 points)

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

10

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

Therefore, the number 6.4 rounded to the nearest whole number is 6. * If the number you are rounding off is followed by 0,1,2,3,4, round the number down. To find 6.4 rounded to the nearest whole number.

Please Mark me brainliest

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

The angles created by the diagonals of a rhombus add up to 360 meaning each one is 90 degrees

5x+20 = 90

subtract 20 from both sides

5x = 70

divide by 5 on both sides

x=14

Answer:

The appropriate answer is "523".

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Margin of error,

E = 0.04

Confidence level,

= 95%

Educated guess,

[tex]P_g[/tex] = 0.32

According to the question,

[tex]\alpha = \frac{100-95}{100}[/tex]

   [tex]=0.05[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\alpha}{2} = \frac{0.05}{2}[/tex]

   [tex]=0.025[/tex]

[tex]Z_{0.025} = 1.96[/tex]

The sample size will be:

⇒ [tex]n=P_g (1-P_g) (\frac{Z_{\frac{\alpha}{2} }}{E} )^2[/tex]

By substituting the values, we get

       [tex]=0.32(1-0.32)(\frac{1.96}{0.04} )^2[/tex]

       [tex]=0.32\times 0.68\times (49)^2[/tex]

       [tex]=0.32\times 0.68\times 2401[/tex]

       [tex]=522.4576[/tex]

or,

       [tex]=523[/tex]

Answer:

ME = z*s /√n

Step-by-step explanation:

The margin of error is obtained as the product of the critical value of the distribution at a certain α-level and the standard error :

The critical value = Z*

The standard error = standard deviation / √sample size

Standard deviation = s

Sample size = n

Margin of Error = z * s/√n

Answer:

j = $7.38 / 18

Step-by-step explanation:

1. We have to find the total cost of a 18 juice bottles pack

= $ 9.63 - $ 2.25

= $ 7.38

2. To find how much each bottle of juice costs :

j = $ 7.38 / 18 #

Answer: It travels 560 miles per hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

using the proportion,

2660:4.75:x:1

or, 2660:4.75= x:1

or, 2660/4.75 = x/1

or, 2660 = 4.75x

or, x = 2660/4.75

so, x = 560

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Bonjour,

4,75 h = 4+0,75*60 =

4h 45mn = 4*60 + 45 =240+45 => 265mn

265mn -> 2660 miles

1 mn -> 2660/265

60 mn -> (2660*60)/265=> 602,26miles/h

Answer:

all answer are in given solution

Answer:

ur box cannot be opend  repain the window

Step-by-step explanation:

please mark this answer as brainlist

Answer:

The sum of 1/6 and 1/7 would be 13/42, or, if you wanted the answer in decimal form rounded to the nearest hundredth, it would be about 0.31.

To find the sum of 1/6 and 1/7, we cannot simply add the numerators together and maintain the same denominator. This is because 1/6 and 1/7 have different denominators, so we don't know which denominator to maintain!

To fix this we need to find a number that is divisible by both 6 and 7. One easy way to do this is to multiply the two numbers together:

6 x 7 = 42

If we were to change the denominator to 42 for each fraction, we could add the numerators together and maintain a denominator of 42. However, this means we must change the numerator of each fraction along with its denominator.

Let's start with 1/6. We can multiply 6 by 7 to obtain 42, but this means we also have to multiply 1 by 7 to keep the fraction proportionate. If the fraction does not maintain the same proportion, it will be a completely different fraction!

We know that 1 x 7 = 7, so it is safe to say that 1/6 is equal to 7/42.

We can apply the same logic to 1/7. Since 7 x 6 is 42 we need to multiply 1 by 6 along with 7. Note: you cannot multiply each number by 7 this time, because 7 x 7 would be 49, not 42. In multiplying the numerator and denominator by 6 we know that 1/7 = 6/42.

Now we have an equation of:

6/42 + 7/42

Now we can add it as we would normally by adding the numerators and keeping the denominator to get:

6/42 + 7/42 = 13/42

If you needed the answer in decimal form it would be about 0.3095238095, or 0.31 rounded to the nearest hundredth.

I hope this helped.

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.004 < 0.02, which means that there is sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

The company's promotional literature claimed that over 32% do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use.

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of at most 32%, that is:

[tex]H_0: p \leq 0.32[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if the proportion is more than 32%, that is:

[tex]H_1: p > 0.32[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0.32 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.32 \sigma = \sqrt{0.32*0.68}[/tex]

A sample of 1700 computer chips revealed that 35% of the chips do not fail in the first 1000 hours of their use.

This means that [tex]n = 1700, X = 0.35[/tex]

Value of the test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.35 - 0.32}{\frac{\sqrt{0.32*0.68}}{\sqrt{1700}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = 2.65[/tex]

P-value of the test and decision:

The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion above 0.35, which is 1 subtracted by the p-value of z = 2.65.

Looking at the z-table, z = 2.65 has a p-value of 0.9960.

1 - 0.9960 = 0.004.

The p-value of the test is 0.004 < 0.02, which means that there is sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the company's claim.

Find the difference between each number:

-11 to -3 is +8

-3 to 5 is +8

The difference is 8

Use the following formula:

Bn = b1 + d(b -1)

Answer: bn = -11 + 8( b-1)

Answer:

(-14.8504 ; 0.5644)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data:

Population 1 : 30 35 23 22 28 39 21

Population 2: 45 49 15 34 20 49 36

The difference, d = population 1 - population 2

d = -15, -14, 8, -12, 8, -10, -15

The confidence interval, C. I ;

C.I = dbar ± tα/2 * Sd/√n

n = 7

dbar = Σd/ n = - 7.143

Sd = standard deviation of d = 10.495 (using calculator)

tα/2 ; df = 7 - 1 = 6

t(0.10/2,6) = 1.943

Hence,

C.I = - 7.143 ± 1.943 * (10.495/√7)

C.I = - 7.143 ± 7.7074

(-14.8504 ; 0.5644)

Answer:

The 95% confidence interval for the true difference between the mean times on this course for teams of Siberian Huskies and teams of other breeds of sled dogs is (-0.8276, 0.2276).

Step-by-step explanation:

Before building the confidence interval, we need to understand the central limit theorem and subtraction of normal variables.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.  

Subtraction between normal variables:

When two normal variables are subtracted, the mean is the difference of the means, while the standard deviation is the square root of the sum of the variances.

Siberian Huskies:

Sample of 47, mean of 5.2 minutes, standard deviation of 1.4. So

[tex]\mu_1 = 5.2[/tex]

[tex]s_1 = \frac{1.4}{\sqrt{47}} = 0.2042[/tex]

Others:

Sample of 39, mean of 5.5 minutes, standard deviation of 1.1. So

[tex]\mu_2 = 5.5[/tex]

[tex]s_2 = \frac{1.1}{\sqrt{39}} = 0.1761[/tex]

Distribution of the difference:

[tex]\mu = \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 5.2 - 5.5 = -0.3[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{s_1^2+s_2^2} = \sqrt{0.2042^2+0.1761^2} = 0.2692[/tex]

Confidence interval:

We have that to find our [tex]\alpha[/tex] level, that is the subtraction of 1 by the confidence interval divided by 2. So:

[tex]\alpha = \frac{1 - 0.95}{2} = 0.025[/tex]

Now, we have to find z in the Z-table as such z has a p-value of [tex]1 - \alpha[/tex].

That is z with a pvalue of [tex]1 - 0.025 = 0.975[/tex], so Z = 1.96.

Now, find the margin of error M as such

[tex]M = zs[/tex]

In which s is the standard error. So

[tex]M = 1.96(0.2692) = 0.5276[/tex]

The lower end of the interval is the sample mean subtracted by M. So it is -0.3 - 0.5276 = -0.8276.

The upper end of the interval is the sample mean added to M. So it is -0.3 + 0.5276 = 0.2276

The 95% confidence interval for the true difference between the mean times on this course for teams of Siberian Huskies and teams of other breeds of sled dogs is (-0.8276, 0.2276).

Answer:

was assigned with this problem (the reference text is attached):

Which of the following, if included in a student's paper, would NOT be an example of plagiarism?

1. In the game of baseball, which is rather boring, the batter stands on home base (Hughes 1).

2. Baseball is rather surprisingly known as "America's Favorite Pastime."

3. Baseball is "a rather boring sport played between two teams of nine players" (Hughes 1).

4. All of these are plagiarism.

The answer tells that only the third choice is NOT a plagiarism. My question is, why is the first choice a plagiarismwas assigned with this problem (the reference text is attached):

Which of the following, if included in a student's paper, would NOT be an example of plagiarism?

1. In the game of baseball, which is rather boring, the batter stands on home base (Hughes 1).

2. Baseball is rather surprisingly known as "America's Favorite Pastime."

3. Baseball is "a rather boring sport played between two teams of nine players" (Hughes 1).

4. All of these are plagiarism.

The answer tells that only the third choice is NOT a plagiarism. My question is, why is the first choice a plagiarism

Answer:

700,000

Step-by-step explanation:

700,000 is already a 100,000, therefore there is no rounding to do.

Answer:

700,000 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Y = -x + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

y = -x + 8

y = 1x + b

10 = 8 + b

b = 2

Answer:

y-y1=m(x-x1)

y-10=8(x-8)

y-10=8x-64

y-10+64-8x

y+54-8x

y-8x+54

Answer:

3/4y +5/3 = x

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 4(3x-5)/9

Multiply each side by 9

9y = 4(3x-5)/9*9

9y = 4(3x-5)

Divide each side by 4

9/4 y = 4/4 (3x-5)

9/4y = 3x-5

Add 5 to each side

9/4y +5 = 3x-5+5

9/4y +5 = 3x

Divide by 3

9/4 y *1/3 +5/3 = 3x/3

3/4y +5/3 = x

Answer:

a) The 99% confidence interval for the difference of proportions is (0.0844, 0.3012).

b) We are 99% sure that the true difference in proportions is between 0.0844 and 0.3012. Since all values are positive, there is significant evidence at the 1 - 0.99 = 0.01 significance level to conclude that the proportion is the Fort Defiance region is higher than in the Indian Wells region.

Step-by-step explanation:

Before finding the confidence interval, we need to understand the central limit theorem and subtraction of normal variables.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

For a proportion p in a sample of size n, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion will be approximately normal with mean [tex]\mu = p[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

Subtraction between normal variables:

When two normal variables are subtracted, the mean is the difference of the means, while the standard deviation is the square root of the sum of the variances.

Fort Defiance:

69 out of 210, so:

[tex]p_1 = \frac{69}{210} = 0.3286[/tex]

[tex]s_1 = \sqrt{\frac{0.3286*0.6714}{210}} = 0.0324[/tex]

Indian Wells:

22 out of 162, so:

[tex]p_2 = \frac{22}{162} = 0.1358[/tex]

[tex]s_2 = \sqrt{\frac{0.1358*0.8642}{162}} = 0.0269[/tex]

Distribution of the difference:

[tex]p = p_1 - p_2 = 0.3286 - 0.1358 = 0.1928[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{s_1^2+s_2^2} = \sqrt{0.0324^2 + 0.0269^2} = 0.0421[/tex]

a. Find a 99% confidence interval for p1 -p2.

The confidence interval is:

[tex]p \pm zs[/tex]

In which

z is the z-score that has a p-value of [tex]1 - \frac{\alpha}{2}[/tex].

99% confidence level

So [tex]\alpha = 0.01[/tex], z is the value of Z that has a p-value of [tex]1 - \frac{0.01}{2} = 0.995[/tex], so [tex]Z = 2.575[/tex].

The lower bound of the interval is:

[tex]p - zs = 0.1928 - 2.575*0.0421 = 0.0844[/tex]

The upper bound of the interval is:

[tex]p + zs = 0.1928 + 2.575*0.0421 = 0.3012[/tex]

The 99% confidence interval for the difference of proportions is (0.0844, 0.3012).

Question b:

We are 99% sure that the true difference in proportions is between 0.0844 and 0.3012. Since all values are positive, there is significant evidence at the 1 - 0.99 = 0.01 significance level to conclude that the proportion is the Fort Defiance region is higher than in the Indian Wells region.

Answer:

5 people.

Step-by-step explanation:

First we need to find how many people 36 tables seats. In order to do this, we need to multiply 36 (tables) by 4 (people sitting) to get 144. Now just subtract 144 from 179 to see how many people are left, here we get 35. Since there are 7 booths, we divide 35 by 7 to get 5. Each booth holds 5 people.

(179-36x4)/7=5

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Graph it

We have to figure out what the product of DA is,

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}-1&2&3\\8&-4&0\\6&7&1\\ \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}1\\3\\5\\ \end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}a\\b\\c\\ \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

We know that,

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}a&b&c\\d&e&f\\g&h&i\\\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x\\y\\z\\\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}ax+by+cz\\dx+ey+fz\\gx+hy+iz\\\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

So,

[tex]a=-1\cdot1+2\cdot3+3\cdot5=-1+6+15=20[/tex]

[tex]b=8\cdot1+(-4)\cdot3+0\cdot5=8-12=-4[/tex]

[tex]c=6\cdot1+7\cdot3+1\cdot5=6+21+5=32[/tex]

So the solution is,

[tex]a,b,c=\boxed{20,-4,32}[/tex]

Hope this helps :)

======================================================

Explanation:

The five number summary is the set of these items, in this exact order

So with the five number summary 4.6, 14.3, 19.7, 26.1, 31.2, we see that

Q1 = 14.3 and Q3 = 26.1

Subtracting these two values gets us the IQR (interquartile range)

IQR = Q3 - Q1

IQR = 26.1 - 14.3

IQR = 11.8

Answer: $1,223.40.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since she earns $22.5 per hour, for 34 hours, she would earn:

$22.5 × 34 = $765

She earn 3% of her sales, therefore find 3% of $15,280:

$15280(3%) = $15280(0.03) = $458.4

Add them together:

$765 + $458.4 = $1223.4

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  $1,223.40

Step-by-step explanation:

Zoe's total pay is the sum of the products of hours and hourly rate, and sales and commission rate.

  Pay = (34 h)($22.50/h) +($15,280)(.03) = $765.00 +458.40

  Pay = $1,223.40

Zoe's pay for the week is $1,223.40.

Answer:  [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we need to open the brackets on either side of the equation.

[tex]\frac{z}3}[/tex] - 4z+4 = 5z-10+1

After opening the brackets, we need to separate the variables from the constants.

[tex]\frac{z}{3}[/tex] -4z-5z = -10+1-4

Then we need to convert the variable fraction into a normal variable by multiplying the variable fraction and also all other terms in the equation.

3([tex]\frac{z}{3}[/tex]) 3(-4z) 3(-5z) = 3(-10) + 3(1) + 3(-4)

z -12z -15z = -30+3-12

Now, we can simplify the equation !

-26z = -39

z = -39÷-26

  =  [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  a.  x = 60

  b.  y = 93

Step-by-step explanation:

The relevant relations are ...

__

Using these relations, we have ...

  A = (BC -x°)/2

  x° = BC -2A = 114° -2(27°)

  x° = 60°

__

  y° = CD/2 = (360° -BC -BD)/2 = (360° -114° -60°)/2

  y° = 93°

Answer:

x=20.938

Step-by-step explanation:

-2.053748911 = (x - 21)/.03

x=20.938

Answer:

x = 34

Step-by-step explanation:

Pytago:

x[tex]30^{2} + 16^{2} = x^2\\x = \sqrt{30^2 + 16^2} \\x = 34[/tex]

Answer:

The answer is (C)

17.37 + .50x

ED2021