Mr. Johnnie B. Good has a furniture business which he operates as a sole proprietor. The business has been doing well for several years and now he wants to finance the expansion of his business by way of a loan and he is thinking of approaching BCN Bank accordingly. He is also planning to buy a great deal of raw material on credit from Miller’s Hardware in support of the business expansion. Mr. Good in looking at the potential risks to his personal assets and in an effort to safeguard himself from losing his personal assets if the business failed and was not able to repay the loan or pay for the material he got on credit, filed the relevant documents with the companies office and incorporated a private company, Good Furniture Ltd, with him as the sole shareholder and director and then went ahead and obtained a loan in the company’s name from the bank and bought the raw material on credit on behalf of the company. The bank in providing the loan ensured that Mr. Good signed a personal guarantee for the entire loan amount.

Shortly after receiving the loan and the material on credit, the business faced severe competition from other furniture stores who imported much cheaper furniture and so the business failed and had no business assets to cover the loan or to pay for the material taken on credit.

BCN Bank and Miller’s Hardware both sue to recover their respective amounts and each is seeking to get a court order to have Mr. Good sell his personal assets to meet the obligations of Good Furniture Ltd. Both Claimants are contending that the ‘one man’ company is merely a shield to what is in essence a sole proprietorship business.

Using case law and statute, advise Mr. Good as to the likelihood of success of:

A) Miller’s Hardware

B) BCN Bank

A) Miller's Hardware: Unless Miller's Hardware can prove fraudulent intent or abuse of the corporate form, it's unlikely to hold Mr. Good personally liable.

B) BCN Bank: Mr. Good's personal guarantee strengthens BCN Bank's chances of success in recovering the loan amount from his personal assets.

Mr. Good's situation involves the concept of piercing the corporate veil, which refers to disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation to hold its shareholders personally liable. In this case, Miller's Hardware and BCN Bank are seeking to hold Mr. Good personally liable for the debts of Good Furniture Ltd. Let's analyze the likelihood of success for each claimant:

A) Miller's Hardware:

To determine the likelihood of success for Miller's Hardware, we need to consider the circumstances under which the court may pierce the corporate veil. The court will generally pierce the corporate veil if it can be shown that the company is merely an alter ego or a sham used to avoid legal obligations.

Factors considered include commingling of assets, inadequate capitalization, failure to follow corporate formalities, and fraud.

In this case, since Mr. Good incorporated Good Furniture Ltd as a separate legal entity, it demonstrates an intention to operate as a company rather than a sole proprietorship.

Unless Miller's Hardware can provide evidence of fraudulent intent or other factors indicating abuse of the corporate form, the court is unlikely to pierce the corporate veil. Therefore, Miller's Hardware may face challenges in holding Mr. Good personally liable.

B) BCN Bank:

BCN Bank has an advantage over Miller's Hardware because Mr. Good signed a personal guarantee for the loan, assuming personal liability. A personal guarantee is a legally binding agreement, and it can override the protection of limited liability that a corporation provides.

As long as the personal guarantee is valid and enforceable, BCN Bank has a strong chance of success in recovering the loan amount from Mr. Good's personal assets.

In summary, Miller's Hardware may face difficulties in holding Mr. Good personally liable, while BCN Bank is likely to succeed based on the personal guarantee provided by Mr. Good.

For more question on  fraudulent visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30870582

#SPJ8

As an aid to a congressman, provide an essay that addresses the following: Identify and summarize three fiscal policy tools that the federal government may use to combat a inflation. Explain how each tool may reduce the recession and how it impacts employment and growth.

Small Business Management (1)

There are at least eight different pricing strategies for established goods and services. Explain FOUR (4) of those strategies and under what conditions a business owner should use them.

what are the important seo features ?