Answer:
Many European nations came to America to start to start new nations and families. Their goal was to expand and influence others around them. They affected Native Americans because they stole their land and freedom. They also had a lot of habits that often did not the environment
Answer: The new world was an amazing opportunity for European nations to make money and have a "free life". This however was extremely hard on Native American lives, with Americans pushing Native out of their rightful land putting a lot of Natives to death or new "homes".
Explanation: america being america fr
What are Grant and Piechoswski’s argument in the article “Theories and the good: Toward child - centered gifted education “. And what are the 3 functions of theory according to Grant and piechoswski( 1999)?
In their article "Theories and the good: Toward child-centered gifted education," Grant and Piechoswski (1999) argue for the importance of integrating theoretical perspectives in the field of gifted education and emphasize the need for a child-centered approach.
What are Grant and Piechoswski's argument in the article?Grant and Piechoswski (1999) explore the significance of theories in the context of gifted education. They advocate for the integration of various theoretical perspectives to enhance understanding and practice in this field. The authors emphasize the importance of considering children's individual needs and characteristics, advocating for a child-centered approach that takes into account the unique strengths, interests, and developmental aspects of gifted learners.
According to Grant and Piechoswski, theories serve three functions: they provide a framework for understanding and explaining phenomena, they guide practice and decision-making, and they facilitate research and knowledge development.
Read more about education theory
brainly.com/question/29795414
#SPJ1
Which of the following best completes this graphic organizer?
OA. Popular Writers with Political Agendas
OB. Reformers Who Opposed Imperialism
OC. Progressives Who Ran for Office
OD. Philanthropists Who Supported Immigrants
The answer that best completes this graphic organizer is , Philanthropists Who Supported Immigrants. The correct answer is option D.
The graphic organizer deals with the categorization of people who can be defined as “reformers.” Based on this, the answer that best completes this graphic organizer is D, Philanthropists Who Supported Immigrants. What is a Graphic Organizer? A graphic organizer is a visual tool used to organize information in a way that is easy to understand. It's an illustration of how different ideas are related to one another. The graphic organizer shown in this question is set up as a Venn diagram. The people in each circle have something in common, and the area where the circles intersect shows where the two groups have something in common.
By utilizing this sort of graphic organizer, it is possible to compare and contrast different groups of people by examining their characteristics and identifying the points where they overlap or differ.The Graphic Organizer's Possible ChoicesA. Popular Writers with Political Agendas: This option might fit in the graphic organizer if the question was phrased in a way that put a focus on the political agenda of certain individuals. In this case, however, the focus is on people who are classified as “reformers.”
Thus, it is possible to exclude option A.B. Reformers Who Opposed Imperialism: This option might be possible if the graphic organizer had something to do with people who were against imperialism, but since the question does not say anything about imperialism, it is safe to say that this option does not fit in the graphic organizer.C. Progressives Who Ran for Office: This option might fit the graphic organizer since progressivism was a significant political movement in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. However, the graphic organizer in the question is not focused on political movements or parties.
Rather, it is about the classification of people who can be considered “reformers.” Thus, it is possible to exclude this option as well.D. Philanthropists Who Supported Immigrants: This option fits the graphic organizer because philanthropists who supported immigrants are a category of people who can be considered “reformers.” The graphic organizer does not mention politics or political movements, which means that options A, B, and C can be eliminated.
For more such questions on Philanthropists, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/2772093
#SPJ8
Why did Japanese soldiers kill so many civilians in Nanjing, China?
Answer:
There were multiple factors that contributed to the Japanese soldiers killing so many civilians in Nanjing, China during the Second Sino-Japanese War, including extreme nationalism and militarism, the brutal nature of the war, and logistical and organizational issues within the Japanese army.
Explanation:
There were a number of factors that contributed to the brutality of the Japanese soldiers during the Nanjing Massacre. One of the main reasons was the extreme nationalism and militarism that characterized Japanese society at the time. Many Japanese soldiers believed that they were a superior race and that the Chinese were inferior and deserving of punishment.
Another factor was the brutal nature of the war itself. The Japanese army had been engaged in a long and costly campaign in China, and many soldiers were suffering from battle fatigue and other psychological problems. Some historians have also suggested that the Japanese leadership deliberately encouraged their soldiers to engage in brutal tactics in order to intimidate the Chinese population and crush any resistance to Japanese rule.