Whether appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938 is a matter of historical debate.
Appeasement refers to the strategy pursued by British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain to avoid war by making concessions to Nazi Germany, particularly regarding its territorial demands.
Proponents argue that appeasement bought crucial time for England to rearm and prepare for war, while avoiding an immediate conflict.
While critics argue that appeasement only emboldened Hitler and allowed him to continue his aggressive expansionist policies, ultimately leading to World War II.
Ultimately, the consequences of appeasement proved disastrous, as Hitler's ambitions were not curbed, and war became inevitable.
Learn more about appeasement policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/12539886
#SPJ6
how did john quincy adams and andrew jackson justify jackson’s seizure of florida?
Answer:
Eviction of Indians and Taking of Florida In the next few years, Jackson continued to serve as Major General over much of the south-east, with a salary of $2,400 a year and $1,652 in expenses. His staff lived with him, including Sam Houston, the future hero of Texas, and John Eaton (to be heard from later).
The main military activity at that time was the driving of Indians out of lands which white Americans were pouring into, or were about to pour into. Sometimes there was the justification of Indian raids and massacres; sometimes not.
One such affair, the First Seminole War, resulted in U.S. acquisition of Florida.
Spain was fighting a losing battle against revolutions in South America. Florida was mostly a vast swampland, and, being separated from the rest of the Spanish territory, it just caused a dispersal of military manpower. Added to the U.S. however, it would make borders tidier and more defensible, largely preventing, for example, the sort of north-south pincer movement the British tried in 1814.
Also the Seminole Indians straddled the Florida-Georgia border, and they could and did make crossbred raids, retreating to the other side when pursued. Another reason Spanish Florida was seen as a danger by the U.S. was that it contained a fort, inhabited by escaped slaves who, it was felt, encouraged other slaves to run away to its safety. The fort was blown up in 1816, killing 270.
In late 1817, in response to the burning of an Indian village on U.S. territory, Seminoles massacred virtually all on board a transport. (4 men out of 40 escaped, one woman out of seven was spared, and the 4 children on board were all killed).
It appears, in hindsight, that President Monroe (1817-25) somewhat expected Jackson to occupy Florida, and gave him ambiguous signals to that effect - the sort of signals that executives sometimes give their charges when they don't want to be blamed for an action.
Jackson, went into Florida with a couple of thousand men and occupied the fort at St. Marks, in the East, and the fortified town of Pensacola, the center of Spanish rule in Florida. He also had two British subjects (allies of the Indians) hanged.
The Spanish minister demanded evacuation and "suitable punishment" for Jackson. Secretary of State John Quincy Adams' reply berated the Spanish for not restraining the Indians, and included the following: "Spain must immediately [decide] either to place a force in Florida adequate at once to the protection of her territory, ... or cede to the United States a pr
Behind the scenes, Secretary of War John C. CalhounSecretary of the Treasury William H. Crawford, and Representative Henry Clay of Kentucky were perturbed. Calhoun was angry over Jackson's communications with the President, bypassing him. All three men had presidential ambitions, and Jackson's popularity threatened their hopes. Adams, however, backed Jackson up.
Since Jackson was eventually sustained, he attributed it somewhat to his Secretary of War, Calhoun. Jackson had to put up with being called before Congress and berated - particularly by Henry Clay (whom Jackson was coming to hate). Four resolutions to censure Jackson failed, however.
Adams negotiated a treaty buying Florida for five million dollars, and also giving the U.S. a very wide corridor in the West to the Pacific.
Jackson then received the military governorship of Florida while it was being integrated as a U.S. territory. He did a good job, while there, of shaping new institutions compatible with integration in the U.S. He did however, as in New Orleans, use some heavy-handed tactics at times
Explanation:
What are two other names
associated with Communism?
Help me please??
Answer:
Socializm and Marksizm
Explanation:
Two words associated with communism. These are not precise synonyms.
Americans believed World War II was whose problem?
a dispute between foreign nations.
What had to happen before america joins the League of Nations
Answer:
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/all-about-history/20190328/282913796830779
Follow this link and you will get your answer
President Woodrow Wilson first mentioned the League of Nations in his Fourteen Points speech while discussing ways to limit more wars in Europe. Under one Article of the league, any nation under threat required all other nations to assists. This meant that otherwise peaceful nations were going to be required to assist. Because of this article, congress was too afraid to join the league as it feared it would give up American isolationism. Therefore, before the United States could join the League of Nations, it would have to change from an Isolationism mindset to a more interventionism ideology.
I hope this helps! :)
Gumawa ng sanaysay sa kung paano nagamit ang wika
Answer:
the answer is wika
Explanation:
This cartoon appeared in the Catalan newspaper "La Campana de Gràcia" in 1896.
LERA ONCLISAN
Which statement best describes an effect of imperialism on Spanish-American relations illustrated by the cartoon?
ОООО
The United States feared that Spanish actions in Cuba would hurt American business interests.
The United States supported Cuban revolutionary efforts against Spain.
The United States took over temporary control of Cuba from Spain.
The United States pushed Spain to follow through on its promises to reform its rule in Cuba.
The cartoon showed that The United States supported Cuban revolutionary efforts against Spain.
During the Cuban Revolution against Spain:
The Americans supported the Cubans The Americans wanted to protect American businesses The Spanish crackdown in Cuba was criticized by the AmericansMany in Spain viewed the U.S. government's actions in a negative light and this cartoon was one way they expressed those feelings. In the end, war broke out between the two nations.
In conclusion, the cartoon showed U.S. support for Cuban revolution.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/16440373.
Select all that apply.
The Middle East involves these continents.
A: Asia
B: Antarctica
C: Europe
D: South America
E: North America
F: Africa
G: Australia
Answer:
Asia (A), Europe (C), and Africa (F)
Explanation:
The middle east consists of these countries (Almost all of them are in Asia)
1 Egypt (Africa)
2 Turkey (Europe)
3 Iran (Asia)
4 Iraq (Asia)
5 Saudi Arabia (Asia)
6 Yemen (Asia)
7 Syria (Asia)
8 Jordan (Asia)
9 United Arab Emirates (Asia)
10 Israel (Asia)
11 Lebanon (Asia)
12 Oman (Asia)
13 Palestine (Asia)
14 Kuwait (Asia)
15 Qatar (Asia)
16 Bahrain (Asia)
why did britain issue the proclamation of 1763 after the french and indian war?
Answer:
The Proclaimation of 1763 was issued by British King George to keep the peace between the colonists and native americans. This Proclamation was established due to native americans being infuriated by colonists invading their area of settlement.
What does the Executive Office of the President do for the President of the United States?
Answer:
a. supports and advises the president
Explanation: edg
Write the letter corresponding to the correct answer
1. Which of the following series of events respect the chronological principle?
a) the battle of Leipzig - the 100 days; - the Russian campaign;
b) Napoleon becomes emperor of France - the battle of Waterloo - Napoleon's exile on the island of Elba;
c) the battle of Leipzig - Napoleon's exile on the island of Elba - the 100 days;
d) Napoleon becomes First Consul - the establishment of the continental blockade - the decline of the Napoleonic empire;
2. Napoleon concluded the Treaty of Tilsit with:
a) Russia;
b) England;
c) Prussia;
d) France;
3. The continental blockade was directed against:
a) England;
b) Austria;
c) Russia;
d) Prussia;
4. Napoleon returned to rule in France in:
a) 1813;
b) 1814;
c) 1815;
d) 1821;
5. The military campaigns against France were financed by:
a) Russia;
b) Spain;
c) England;
d) Austria;
6. A factor that contributed to the proclamation of Napoleon as Emperor of France was:
a) obtaining the victory at Austerlitz;
b) adoption of the Constitution of year VIII;
c) victories against the European powers;
d) the establishment of the continental blockade;
Answer:
1) C - The battle of Leipzig (1813) - Napoleon's exile on the island of Elba (1814)- the 100 days (1815)
2) C - Prussia (Not too sure though)
3) A - England
4) C - 1815
5) A - Russia
6) D - The establishment of the continental blockade.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Sorry if it's wrong.
List the components of an introduction paragraph in order
List the components of a body paragraph in order
List the components of a conclusion paragraph in order?
Answer: b
Explanation: because I am smart.
Importancia de los próceres e ilustres en la historia de Venezuela
Answer:
Explanation:
Cuáles son los proceres más importantes de Venezuela?
Image result for Importancia de los próceres e ilustres en la historia de Venezuela
Simón Bolívar.
Simón Rodríguez.
José Antonio Páez.
César Rengifo.
Antonio José de Sucre.
Heroínas de la Independencia.
José Félix Ribas.
José María Vargas.
What would have happened to Africa if it hadn't been colonized?
Answer:
OK, so we have a hypothetical Africa in the modern day where colonialism never happened. Let’s for the sake of argument say European colonialism and not the Islamic kind.
So first of all; why? What circumstance leads Europeans not to colonize? Your choices are couldn’t, or wouldn’t. Couldn’t could be because they were technologically incapable of doing so (as was the case for large parts of Africa until the late 19th century due to the “disease barrier”) and wouldn’t because they made a moral decision not to. Each scenario has very different implications.
If its “wouldn’t” and we posit a Europe that managed to collectively agree not to occupy, exploit or settle Africa (which I find mind-boggingly unlikely but never mind); so Africa was given a free reign to develop itself, then:
There are likely to be a couple of dominant nations (or regional groupings) in Southern and Western Africa who dominate the economic and military make up of the continent. This is mainly a simple matter of resources; most African coal and iron deposits are in South Africa/Botswana/Zimbabwe with smaller deposits in Nigeria/West Africa. Of course Nigeria has huge oil deposits but they wouldn’t be in play during the early stages of “non-colonialism”. Without coal and iron close together, industrialization is extremely unlikely to happen (add in the third factor of convenient waterways as well). We can assume Africans learn of European methods of industrialization but without iron and coal its not going to matter that much, because there won’t be any examples of industry building that don’t follow this pattern to build on. This all assumes some kind of evolving polity that wants to industrialize, which isn’t a given, but for the sake of argument think Meiji Japan, and a healthy degree of paranoia about altruistic Europeans who aren’t behaving rationally by the standards of largely feudal Bantu states. There are still a huge number of “ifs” here (can an industrializing Africa trade in finished goods and raw materials to Europe and Asia? How? What kind of shipping and military needs to evolve? Would a proto-industrial state import expertese to create all this stuff like Russia did? Would a financial model evolve independently or are we assuming adoption of European-style banking and financial markets? All of these things have to be created somehow).
So if we assume an industrializing power in say, northern South Africa, its going to spread into other lower population territories for farm land and resources (as happened anyway; the great Bantu migrations were moving into South Africa at the same time as the Dutch started moving north and east from The Cape); and yes,hunter-gatherers like the Khoisan would be pushed aside or wiped out. Possibly even decimated by disease.
Africa won’t be divided by arbitrary European divisions, but it won’t be a million little tribal enclaves either. Human history simply doesn’t work this way. If it did, England would still be five countries instead of one part of a larger one. The dominant industrial powers could end up dominating a lot of other tribes and territories. I make no claims for the form of that domination.
Africa’s raw materials resources would make more money for Africans, but that doesn’t mean all Africans. There’s nothing in African history to suggest socialist or egalitarian traits; while Africa would definitely done a lot better trading with the rest of the world as equals, its very difficult to say whether the average African would have seen the benefits. In some areas, definitely, but in others, not so much.
Christianity wouldn’t be (as much of ) a thing. If Europeans aren’t bringing the Bible at gunpoint, then missionaries would have had to do all the work; and the reality is they weren’t making massive inroads in terms of conversions until the Europeans literally occupied the whole continent. There were Christians in Egypt and Ethiopia but almost everywhere else Christianisation wasn’t a thing once you got 50 miles inland from the coast until after Europeans took over. Islam was FAR more successful in Africa until the late 1800s. Without colonialism Africa still might have some very interesting religious beliefs floating about.
So what about the “couldn’t” scenario? This to a certain extent is the more realistic option, but it posits a less technologically advanced Europe who haven’t figured out some pretty key stuff, like how to build long-distance shipping, or economics. In this scenario Europe is still effectively in the 14th century (at best) and in that case, we know what Africa would look like; pretty much as it did back then.
Explanation:
Mark me brainly please
Primaries are elections in which….
A. Members of the same party face off in an election to see who will get the parties nomination.
B. A democrat goes up against a republican in
an election
Answer:
It's A
Explanation:
Primaries are always first and usually political parties trying choose a person to face their opposite political party candidate in general election.
match these items.
1 .
Rehoboam
Introduced Baal worship into Israel
2 .
Ahab
Solomon's son and successor
3 .
Zechariah
Destroyed Baal worship in Israel
4 .
Hoshea
Became prisoner of king of Assyria
5 .
Jehu
Was the fourth and final king in the dynasty of Jehu
please answer all
Answer:
1. Ahab
2. Rehoboam
3. Jehu
4. Hoshea
5. Zechariah
PLEASE HELP ASAP !!
Who were the Kulaks ?
A, Political dissidents who fought Stalin within the Soviet Union
B. German agents who spied on Stalin for the Soviet Union.
C. Poor farmers who were shipped ff to labor caps by Stalin
D. Wealthy peasants blamed by Stalin for causing food shortages in the Soviet Union
Make a rap battle Gangis Khan vs Mulan
Answer:
x100 boots n cats
Explanation:
Select the correct answer. The Dust Bowl inspired John Steinbeck to write The Grapes of Wrath, which today is considered an American classic. Which statement best describes the purpose of the book? O A. The novel paints a realistic picture of the troubles that migrating Oklahoman farmers faced during the drought in the 1930s. O B. The novel is an exaggerated portrayal of the struggles of African American communities in Oklahoma during the 1930s. O C. The story describes the plight of African American communities in Oklahoma because of the Dust Bowl and the Tulsa race riot. OD. The story describes how drought and dust storms caused farmers to become socialists and revolt against the government. O E. The story paints a realistic picture of the heightened racial tensions in Oklahoma when farmers were out of work during the drought in the 1930s.
The main purpose of the novel is that its exaggerated and portrayed of the struggles of African-American communities in Oklahoma during the 1930s.
What was the great dust storm?In Oklahoma, the great dust storm of Oklahoma happened in 1930 and made the weather threw up so much dirt that results to zero visibility .
Hence, the main purpose of the novel is that its exaggerated and portrayed of the struggles of African-American communities in Oklahoma during the 1930s.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about the Dust storm
brainly.com/question/11943500
What is the significance of the Battle of Yorktown?
A. The British won the war
B. It caused France to join the war
C. It completely ended fighting in North America
D. It led to the start of peace negotiations
Which three settlements were part of the Middle Colonies?
Answer:
Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey
Answer: The middle colonies included Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware. Advantaged by their central location, the middle colonies served as important distribution centers in the English mercantile system. New York and Philadelphia grew at a fantastic rate.
Explanation:
I need the definitions of all these words by 1030 pm tonight. I would greatly appreciate it if you helped me and i will give you brainliest if you help me. tysm :)
Reformation
Martin Luther
Calvinism (John Calum)
Edict of worms
Christian Humanism
Salvation
Indulgence
Desiderius Erasmus
Luther's 95 Thesis
Lutheranism
Protestantism
Justincation
Predestination
Ulrich Zwingli
Council of Trent
Catholic Reformation
Answer:
Defenitions of these words.
Reformation - An act of reforming a practice/institution.
Martin Luther - a German professor who was a priest, author, composer, and was a professor of theology.
Calvinism - A system by Calvin and his followers for the sovereignty of God.
Edict of Worms - A diet of Emperor Charles V in attempt to ban Luther’s writings/words making him an enemy of the state.
Christian humanism - Belief of individual conscience, unencumbered rational inquiry, and a human’s freedom.
Salvation - A religious term for being in a state of being protected/saved in a situation.
Indulgence - The path to decrease a quantity of a punishment an individual had to undergo for sins.
Desiderius Erasmus - A dutch philosopher and catholic theologian who is seen as one of the greatest scholars of the northern renaissance.
Luther’s 95 thesis - A thesis which spoke of two beliefs — People have the chance to reach salvation by just their faith and not deeds and the Bible is the central religious authority.
Lutheranism - A church that is one of the biggest branches of protestantism.
Justification - An action of making righteous in the eyes of God.
Predestination - A predicted doctrine of what god has ordained would happen.
Ulrich Zwingli - A pastor who leaded the reformation in Switzerland,
I worked really hard. On this and I hope this is what you are looking for. Good luck on what you are doing and hope this helps! :D
And please tell me if any of these are incorrect. Thanks.
Convert 21/4 to a mixed number.
Answer:
5¼
Explanation:
Fraction = 21 / 4
Quotient = 5
Remainder = 1
Denominator = 4
Mixed number of 21 / 4 = 5¼
how did the ww1 help contribute to the great depression
Answer:
world war 1 caused a lot of debt to the united states and it sent the usa into a spiraling deppression
Explanation:
In the image provided with circled text in yellow and highlighted in red. Where it says
“Democracy is not inevitable”
What does it mean? What does that mean?
A state’s legislative branch
Answer:
A. makes laws and approves budgets.
Explanation: is correct
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
After the Revolutionary War, which branch of government did the states make
more powerful?
Answer:
legislative branch
Explanation:
Most colonies took power away from their governor (executive branch) while giving additional power to their assemblies (legislative branch).
__________ is a medieval European law established a uniform and unbiased system for deciding commercial disputes across borders and political boundaries.
Answer: Lex Mercatoria, Merchant Law
Explanation: I hope this helps :) You've got this!
The Lex Mercatoria, also known as the Law Merchant, is an international system of law that was developed during the Middle Ages and is still in use today. This system of law is formulated to resolve disputes between merchants and international traders in an impartial manner.
It lays out procedures and rules to ensure that disputes are settled in an efficient and fair manner. It served as an alternative form of justice during this time, as it was commonly more accessible than local courts. It was instrumental in unifying traders and merchants in different countries, creating a consistent set of laws and regulations.
It was, in effect, a form of international commercial law used to settle commercial disputes in an equitable and expeditious manner. Even today, the Lex Mercatoria serves as an important part of international law, and is widely used by the courts.
To know more about Lex Mercatoria, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30408604
#SPJ3
What is magnetic energy ?
Answer:
(physics) The potential energy of a magnetic field.
Explanation:
what did john hancock do in the american revolution
Answer: Hancock used his wealth and influence to aid the movement for American independence.
Explanation:
three examples of Jim Crow laws.
Answer:
Marriages between African Americans and Native Americans were also prohibited. Establishment of segregated libraries for different races was authorized. All schools were required to be racially segregated. There were to be separate but equal accommodations for whites and African Americans provided in nursing homes.
Explanation:
