can you help me to do this ​

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey there!

Here;

f(x) = 2x²-x+1

g(X) = x²+3x-3

Since f(X) = g(X);

2x²-x+1 = x²+3x-3

2x²-x²-x-3x+1+3 = 0

x²-4x+4 = 0

(x-2)² = 0

Therefore, the value of X is 2.

Hope it helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation is in the attachment

Hope it helpful to you

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that a^b^c = a^(b*c)

7 ^ 1/5 ^ 5

7^ (1/5*5)

7^1

7

Answer:

x> 0

Step-by-step explanation:

There is an open circle at 0 so this means it is not equal to

The line goes to the right so x is greater than

x> 0

Answer:

2 × 2 × 3 × 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that,

The number = 60

To find,

Factors of 60 greater than 1 = ?

Procedure:

As we know,

Any of various numbers multiplied together to form a whole.

To find the factors of a number, we will have to do its prime factorization.

So,

The prime factorization of 60:

1 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 5 = 60

Since the factors greater than 1 are asked, the factors would be;

2 * 2 * 3 * 5

Thus, 2 * 2 * 3 * 5 is the correct answer.

Answer:

When AB coincides with AC, the boundary of EAF maps exactly onto the boundary of CAD, implying that EAF dilates into CAD. So, the boundaries of EAF and CAD are similar.

The proportional relationship may be stated in different forms, but should be equivalent to this equation:

radius of Ab/ radius of Ac= length of arc EF/ length of arc CD

Explanations will vary, but should be based on the similarity of EAF and CAD. The proportional relationship follows from the fact that corresponding pairs of lengths in two similar figures have the same ratio.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is the exact answer so make sure you change it up a little.

Answer:

When AB coincides with AC, the boundary of EAF maps exactly onto the boundary of CAD, implying that EAF dilates into CAD. So, the boundaries of EAF and CAD are similar.

The proportional relationship may be stated in different forms, but should be equivalent to this equation:

the radius of AB /radius of AC= length of arc EF/length of arc CD

The proportional relationship follows from the fact that corresponding pairs of lengths in two similar figures have the same ratio.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-8

Step-by-step explanation:

what do you think, when you look at the examples given in the problem definition ?

don't you see the pattern, that f(x) = x+2 ?

f(1) = 1+2 = 3

f(2) = 2+2 = 4

f(3) = 3+2 = 5

so, if we follow this assumption, then

f(-10) = -10 + 2 = -8

Answer:

thats the question?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

At least 7 girls: 0.5^7 OR 0.0078125

At least 8 girls: 0.5^8 OR 0.00390625

Answer:

3.398

Step-by-step explanation:

log(10) 2500 = log(10) (5^2*10^2) = log(10) 5^2 + log(10) 10^2 = 2*log(10) 5 + 2=3.398

Answer:

Currently, Alex is 32 years old. His son is 8 years old,

Solution: denote the age of Alex’s son as ‘x’. Alex’s age is 4x

In 16 years, Alex’s age will be 4x + 16. His son’s age will be x + 16

4x + 16 = 2(x+16). solving this equation yields:

4x + 16 = 2x + 32. Grouping like terms algebraically gives: 2x = 16

Thus x = 16/2 = 8. 4(8) = 32

Answer:

Alex is 24, Bernard is 12, and Calvin is 16.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let Alex's age be A, Bernard's age be B, and Calvin's age be C.

We can write equations to model each situation.

Alex is twice as old as Bernard. In other words:

[tex]A=2B[/tex]

Calvin is eight year younger than Alex. In other words:

[tex]C = A - 8[/tex]

And the sum of all their ages is 52. Therefore:

[tex]A + B + C = 52[/tex]

This is a triple system of equations. We can solve it by substitution. Substitution A and C:

[tex](2B)+B+(A-8)= 52[/tex]

Substitute:

[tex]2B+ B + (2B) -8 = 52[/tex]

Combine like terms:

[tex]5B-8=52[/tex]

Solve for B. Add 8 to both sides:

[tex]5B = 60[/tex]

And divide both sides by five:

[tex]B=12[/tex]

Therefore, Bernard is 12 years old.

Since Alex is twice as old as Bernard, Alex must be 24 years old.

And since Calvin is eight years younger than Alex, Calvin is 16.

In conclusion, Alex is 24, Bernard is 12, and Calvin is 16.

Answer:  90

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\displaystyle\ \Large \boldsymbol{} (\sqrt{0,04}-\sqrt{(-1,2)^2}+\sqrt{121 } ) \cdot \sqrt{81} = \\\\\\(0,2-1,2+11)\cdot 9=(11-1)\cdot 9=90[/tex]

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

r=5

So

=5⁴-5(5)³-4(5)²+5(5)+75

=5⁴-5(125)-4(25)+5(5)+75

=625-625-100+25+75

=0

Answer:

20 and 42

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the greater number be x and the smaller number be y.

3(x +y)= 186

x +y= 186 ÷3

x +y= 62 -----(1)

x -y= 22

x= y +22 -----(2)

Substitute (2) into (1):

y +22 +y= 62

2y= 62 -22 (-22 on both sides)

2y= 40

y= 40 ÷2

y= 20

Substitute y= 20 into (2):

x= 20 +22

x= 44

Thus, the two numbers are 20 and 42.

i- dont know...sorry

The image of this question is missing and so i have attached it.

Answer:

dd/dt = 4.47 ft/s

Step-by-step explanation:

From the image attached, let's denote the following;

d = horizontal distance beneath pulley

h = height of pulley

l = diagonal from the pulley to the head of the person

v = velocity of rope rising

Using pythagoras theorem;

l² = d² + h²

Differentiating with respect to time and considering h = c^(te) gives;

2l(dl/dt) = 2d(dd/dt)

We are given;

d = 20 ft

h = 10 ft

v = 4 ft/s

We know that velocity in this case is change in diagonal distance with time. Thus;

v = dl/dt = 4 ft/s

From earlier, we saw that;

2l(dl/dt) = 2d(dd/dt)

Thus, reducing it gives

(dl/dt)(l/d) = dd/dt

Now, l² = d² + h²

l = √(d² + h²)

Also, v = dl/dt = 4

Thus;

4(√(d² + h²))/d = dd/dt

4(√(20² + 10²))/20 = dd/dt

dd/dt = 4.47 ft/s

Answer:

x=11

Step-by-step explanation:

The two angles add to a right angle which is 90 degrees

35+5x = 90

Subtract 35 from each side

35+5x-35 = 90-35

5x= 55

Divide by 5

5x/5 = 55/5

x = 11

Answer:

383.54 m

Step-by-step explanation:

The length of the training track running around the field = circumference of the circle formed by the two semicircles + 2(length of the rectangle)

The two semicircles forms a fill circle with diameter (d) = width of rectangle = 61 m

Length of rectangle (L) = 96 m

π = 3.14

The length of the training track running around the field = πd + 2(L)

Substitute the values

The length of the training track running around the field = 3.14*61 + 2(96)

= 191.54 + 192

= 383.54 m

Answer:

1246 teams

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told there are 7women & 6men.

If 5 people are selected and there must be more women than men in the team.

This means there must be a minimum of 3 women.

Thus;

For 3 women;

7C3 × 6C2 = 525

For 4 women;

7C4 × 6C3 = 700

For 5 women;

7C5 × 6C0 = 21

Thus;

Total = 525 + 700 + 21 = 1246 teams

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

By applying tangent rule in the given right triangle AOB,

tan(30°) = [tex]\frac{\text{Opposite side}}{\text{Adjacent side}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}=\frac{BO}{OA}[/tex]

[tex]OA=BO(\sqrt{3})[/tex]

By applying tangent rule in the given right triangle BOC,

tan(60°) = [tex]\frac{OC}{BO}[/tex]

OC = BO(√3)

OA + OC = AC

[tex]BO(\sqrt{3})+BO(\sqrt{3}) =60[/tex]

2√3(BO) = 60

BO = 10√3

OC = BO(√3)

OC = (10√3)(√3)

OC = 30

By applying tangent rule in right triangle DOC,

tan(60°) = [tex]\frac{OD}{OC}[/tex]

OD = OC(√3)

OD = 30√3

Since, BD = BO + OD

BD = 10√3 + 30√3

BD = 40√3

      ≈ 69.3

Answer:

6√7 m/s

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

u = 12

a = - 3

s = 18

v^2 = u^2 - 2as

= 12^2 - 2 ( - 3 ) ( 18 )

= 144 + 108

v^2 = 252

v = √252

v = 6√7 m/s

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps you...:)....

Answer:

SA = 664 in.²

Step-by-step explanation:

Surface area of the rectangular prism = 2(LW + LH + WH)

Where,

Length (L) = 16 in.

Width (W) = 5 in.

Height (H) = 12 in.

Substitute the values

Surface area of the rectangular prism = 2(16*5 + 16*12 + 5*12)

= 2(80 + 192 + 60)

= 2(332)

= 664 in.²

sorry i don't know answe're of this question

Answer:

4√3

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a right triangle. When two sides are given in a right triangle, we need to use the Pythagorean Theorem to solve for the third side.

Pythagorean Theorem: a² + b² = c²

The a here is 11, while the b is x. The c is always the hypotenuse (the longest side), which is 13.

Now we substitute:

11² + x² = 13²

121 + x² = 169

-121           -121

x² = 48

√x² = √48

x = √48 <-- We can simplify that.

√48 = 12 * 4 = 3 * 4 * 4 = 4√3

Hello !

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{\sf x=4\sqrt 3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

It is a right-angled triangle. To find the value of x, we will have to use the Pythagorean theorem which says that the lengths of the sides of a right-angled triangle satisfy the following equality :

[tex]\boxed{\sf c^2=a^2+b^2}[/tex]

Where :

In this triangle, we can consider a = 11, b = x, and c = 13.

Let's substitute the values of a, b, and c into the formula.

[tex]\sf 13^2=11^2+x^2[/tex]

Now we have to solve the equation to find the value of x.

Let's subtract 11² from both sides and calculate.

[tex]\sf 13^2-11^2=11^2-11^2+x^2\\x^2=13^2-11^2\\x^2=169-121\\x^2=48[/tex]

Reminder : if x² = a (a ≥ 0), then x = ±√a.

Let's apply that to our equation.

[tex]\sf x=\pm \sqrt{48}[/tex]

x represents a distance, it must be positive. The unique solution is:

[tex]\sf x=\sqrt{48}\\\boxed{\sf x=4\sqrt 3}[/tex]

Have a nice day ;)

Answer:

x + 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:6x^3 + 6 = 6 ^ 3+ 1 = 6(x+1) (x^2 - x + 1)

Answer:

6(3√3-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

(√8/3 - √24 + √50/3) . √6

(√8/3 - 2√6 + 25√2/3) . √6

(2√2/3 - 2√6 + 25√2/3) . √6

(27√2/3 - 2√6) . √6

(27√12/3 - 12)

9√12-12

√12(9-√12)

2√3(9-2√3)

6(3√3-2)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]( \sqrt{8/3} - \sqrt{24} + \sqrt{50/3} )* \sqrt{6} =\\\sqrt{48/3} - \sqrt{144} + \sqrt{300/3} =\\\sqrt{16} - 12 + \sqrt{100} =\\4 - 12 + 10 =\\2[/tex]

Answer:

Q, quadrant 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The letter is     Q

And the quadrant is (x,-y) i.e quadrant no. 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Height of the house = 3 meter (Approx.)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Scale model;

1 centimeter = 0.6 meter

According to graph

Height of cube = 5 cube = 5 centimeter

Find:

Height of the house

Computation:

Height of the house = height of the house in scale model x Scale model

Height of the house = 5 x 0.6

Height of the house = 3

Height of the house = 3 meter (Approx.)

Answer:

My best guess rn is the first option

Step-by-step explanation:

the last dude had it close but it was basically flipped as you can tell.

The answer is (C) [tex]R_2=\frac{R_TR_1}{(R_1-R_T)}[/tex]

We need to make [tex]R_2[/tex] the subject of the formula [tex]R_T=\frac{R_1R_2}{R_1+R_2}[/tex]

First remove the denominator by multiplying both sides by the binomial [tex](R_1+R_2)[/tex]

[tex]R_T\times (R_1+R_2)=\frac{R_1R_2}{R_1+R_2}\times(R_1+R_2)\\\\R_TR_1+R_TR_2=R_1R_2[/tex]

Arrange all terms containing [tex]R_2[/tex] on one side

[tex]R_1R_2-R_TR_2=R_TR_1[/tex]

Factor out [tex]R_2[/tex] from the LHS

[tex]R_2(R_1-R_T)=R_TR_1[/tex]

Finally, divide both sides by the binomial [tex](R_1-R_T)[/tex] to leave [tex]R_2[/tex]

[tex]R_2(R_1-R_T)\times\frac{1}{(R_1-R_T)}=R_TR_1\times\frac{1}{(R_1-R_T)}\\\\R_2=\frac{R_TR_1}{(R_1-R_T)}[/tex]

Learn more about change of subject of formula here: https://brainly.com/question/343660

Answer: C- Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to oppose the company's claim.

Note: I'm not sure this is correct o_O

I used a graphing calculator and calculated the t-interval of the jellybean sample using a 99% confidence level:

tInterval 9.68,1.23,125,0.99

It resulted in 9.68 ± 0.287805.

Therefore, we're 99% confident that the weight number of jellybeans would lie between 9.3922 oz and 9.9678 oz.

A weight of 9.45 oz lies within this range, therefore, it is possible that the candy company's claim is true.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to oppose the company's claim.

Statistics is the discipline that concerns the collection, organization, analysis, interpretation, and presentation of data.

Mean weight was 9.68 oz

standard deviation of 1.23 oz

n=125

µₙ=9.68

σₙ=1.23/√125

=0.11

Confidence level 99%

z=2.58

-z<x-µₙ/σₙ<z

9.68-2.58(0.11)<x<9.68+2.58(0.11)

9.3962<x<9.9638

9.45 is between this range

Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to oppose the companys claim.

Hence, Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to oppose the company's claim.

To learn more on Statistics click:

https://brainly.com/question/29093686

#SPJ2

3/5kg + 760g

3/5kg = 3/5×1000

= 600g

Now

600g + 760g = 1360g

Or 1.36kg

Answered by Gauthmath must click thanks and mark brainliest