The object will travel 24 m during the first 3 seconds.
The distance traveled by the object during the first 3 seconds can be determined by using the equation for uniformly accelerated motion:
d = ut + (1/2)a[tex]t^2[/tex]
where d is the distance, u is the initial velocity (which is 0 in this case since the object starts from rest), a is the acceleration, and t is the time.
Given that the object moves 2m during the first second, we can find the acceleration using the formula:
2 = (1/2) * a * [tex](1^2)[/tex]
Simplifying the equation:
2 = (1/2) * a
a = 4 [tex]m/s^2[/tex]
Now we can calculate the distance traveled during the first 3 seconds:
d = (0) * (3) + (1/2) * (4) * [tex](3^2)[/tex]
d = 0 + 6 + 18
d = 24 m
In the explanation, we used the equation for uniformly accelerated motion to calculate the distance traveled by the object during the first 3 seconds. By determining the acceleration based on the given distance traveled in the first second, we plugged the values into the equation to find that the object will travel 24 m.
Learn more about accelerated motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/55132
#SPJ11
When one does an integral over a flat disk of charge, the result is that the electric field above the center of the disk is: (see Open Stax Example 5.8 and Young \& Freedman Example 21.11) E(x)=
2ϵ
0
σ
(1−
x
2
+R
2
x
) In this expression: R is the radius of the disk σ=Q/A is the charge per area on the disk (A=πR
2
) x is the distance from the center of the disk (perpendicular to the disk) ϵ
0
=8.85×10
−12
C
2
/(Nm
2
) as defined. For a positive charge, the field points away from the disk. Considering this result for the electric field: - The electric field has a finite value at the surface, x=0, unlike the fields due to point and line charges. - The magnitude of the electric field decreases for points away from the disk, in particular for x>0. - The magnitude of the electric field goes to zero very far from the disk, x→[infinity] Consider a charged disk with:
R=4.53 cm(1 cm=10
−2
m)
Q=7.18μC(1μC=10
−6
C)
Define E(0) as the magnitude of the electric field at the surface of the disk. For what distance, x, will the electric field have the magnitude: E(x)=0.62E(0) In other words, at what distance from the disk will the field be a factor of 0.62 smaller than the field at the surface of the plate? Give your answer in cm to at least three significant digits to avoid being counted off due to rounding.
The distance from the disk at which the electric field is 0.21 times the field at the surface is approximately 6.57 cm (or 6.57 × 10⁻² m). The electric field decreases as the distance from the disk increases.
R is the radius of the disk = 4.15 cm
= 4.15 × 10⁻²m
Q = 6.63 μC
= 6.63 × 10⁻⁶ C
€₀(vacuum permittivity) = 8.85 × 10⁻¹² C² N⁻¹ m⁻²
The electric field at the surface of the disk is given by:
E(0) = σ / (2€₀)
= Q/(2πR² €₀)
= (6.63 × 10⁻⁶ C) / (2 × π × (4.15 × 10⁻² m)² × 8.85 × 10⁻¹² C² N⁻¹ m⁻²)
= 55.9 N/C
The electric field E(x) at a distance x from the center of the disk is given by:
E(x) = σ / (2€₀) [1 - z / √(z² + R²)]
= Q / (2πR² €₀) [1 - (x / √(x² + R²))]
= 55.9 N/C [1 - (x / √(x² + (4.15 × 10⁻² m)²))]
The electric field E(x) is given to be: E(x) = 0.21 E(0)
Squaring both sides, E(x)² = (0.21 E(0))²
= (0.21)² (55.9)²
= 6.08 N²/C²
Hence, 55.9² [1 - (x / √(x² + (4.15 × 10⁻² m)²))]² = 6.08
Solving for x, x = 6.57 cm
= 6.57 × 10⁻² m
Therefore, the distance from the disk at which the electric field will be 0.21 E(0) is 6.57 cm.
Learn more about electric field from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/19878202
#SPJ11
Calculate the diameter of a 3.31 cm long tungsten fiament in a lightbulb if its resistance is 0.5899. (The resistivity of tungsten is 5.60×10−8 Rm.) Tries 0/15 How much does it cost in dollars to watch the 5.25 hour-long coverage of the Super Bowl on a 220 Watt teievision set? Assume that one kWh electricity costs 7.51 cents. Tries 0/15
Therefore, the cost of electricity to watch the 5.25-hour-long coverage of the Super Bowl on a 220 Watt television set is 8.66 cents or $0.0866.
Calculation of diameter of a 3.31 cm long tungsten filament in a light bulb if its resistance is 0.5899:
Given data:
Length of the tungsten filament, l = 3.31 cm
Resistance of the tungsten filament, R = 0.5899 Ω
Resistivity of tungsten, ρ = 5.60 × 10⁻⁸ Ωm
We know that resistance of a wire is given by:
R = (ρl)/A
Solving for A:
A = (ρl)/R
Putting the given values in the above equation:
A = (5.60 × 10⁻⁸ Ωm × 3.31 cm)/0.5899 Ω
A = 3.15 × 10⁻⁶ cm²
We know that the area of a circle is given by:
A = πd²/4
Putting the value of A in this equation:
πd²/4 = 3.15 × 10⁻⁶ cm²
Solving for d (diameter):
d² = (4 × 3.15 × 10⁻⁶ cm²)/π
d² = 1.26 × 10⁻⁵ cm²
d = √(1.26 × 10⁻⁵) cm = 0.00355 cm
Therefore, the diameter of the tungsten filament is 0.00355 cm or 35.5 µm.
To know more about tungsten filament visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30226571
#SPJ11
Zn(s)+2HCl(aq)----ZnCl2+H2(g)
Calculate:
2.1.2 The number of moles of 1,4 grams of Zinc
2.1.3mass in grams of ZnCl2
1. The number of moles of 1,4 grams of Zinc is : 0.0214 moles,
2.The mass in grams of [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex] 2.91 grams.
To calculate the number of moles of zinc (Zn) in 1.4 grams, we need to use the molar mass of zinc.
1. Molar mass of zinc (Zn):
The molar mass of Zn is determined by adding up the atomic masses of its constituents. The atomic mass of Zn is 65.38 grams per mole (g/mol).
2. Number of moles of zinc (Zn):
We can use the formula:
Number of moles = Mass / Molar mass
Number of moles = 1.4 g / 65.38 g/mol
Number of moles ≈ 0.0214 mol
Therefore, the number of moles of 1.4 grams of zinc is approximately 0.0214 moles.
2. Mass in grams of[tex]ZnCl_2[/tex]:
To calculate the mass of [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex], we need to consider the balanced equation:
Zn(s) + 2HCl(aq) → [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex](aq) + H2(g)
From the balanced equation, we can see that one mole of Zn reacts with one mole of [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex]. Therefore, the molar ratio between Zn and [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex] is 1:1.
Using the number of moles of zinc calculated earlier (0.0214 moles), we can determine the number of moles of [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex] formed, which is also 0.0214 moles.
Now, we can calculate the mass of [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex]:
Mass = Number of moles × Molar mass
Molar mass of [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex] = molar mass of Zn + 2 × molar mass of Cl
Molar mass of [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex] = 65.38 g/mol + 2 × 35.45 g/mol (the molar mass of chlorine is 35.45 g/mol)
Molar mass of [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex] ≈ 136.28 g/mol
Mass of[tex]ZnCl_2[/tex] = 0.0214 mol × 136.28 g/mol
Mass of [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex] ≈ 2.91 grams
Therefore, the mass in grams of [tex]ZnCl_2[/tex] formed is approximately 2.91 grams.
For more such information on: moles
https://brainly.com/question/29367909
#SPJ8
Describe the net force which acts on an object undergoing simple harmonic motion?
The net force acting on an object undergoing simple harmonic motion is always directed towards the equilibrium position and is proportional to the displacement of the object from its equilibrium position.
Simple harmonic motion is a type of oscillatory motion that follows the laws of a restoring force that is proportional to the object's displacement from the equilibrium point.
This type of motion occurs when a body is attached to a spring or an elastic medium, and the body is displaced from its equilibrium position and released.
The body oscillates back and forth around the equilibrium position.
A net force acts on an object undergoing simple harmonic motion.
The force is a restoring force, which means it acts to bring the object back to its equilibrium position.
This force is proportional to the displacement of the object from its equilibrium position.
The net force acting on an object undergoing simple harmonic motion can be represented by the following equation:
Fnet = -kx
where Fnet is the net force, k is the spring constant, and x is the displacement of the object from its equilibrium position.
This equation tells us that the net force acting on an object undergoing simple harmonic motion is directly proportional to the displacement of the object from its equilibrium position.
The force is always directed towards the equilibrium position and is called the restoring force. The magnitude of the net force acting on the object is maximum at the extreme positions of the oscillation, where the displacement is maximum.
The net force is zero at the equilibrium position, where the displacement is also zero.
Thus, the net force acting on an object undergoing simple harmonic motion is always directed towards the equilibrium position and is proportional to the displacement of the object from its equilibrium position.
To know more about object visit;
brainly.com/question/31018199
#SPJ11
A train has a length of 92.7 m and starts from rest with a constant acceleration at time t=0 s. At this instant, a car just reaches the end of the train. The car is moving with a constant velocity. At a time t=8.12 s, the car just reaches the front of the train. Ultimately, however, the train pulls ahead of the car, and at time t=35.9 s, the car is again at the rear of the train. Find the magnitudes of (a) the car's velocity and (b) the train's acceleration. (a) Number Units (b) Number Units
Therefore, (a) the car's velocity is 28.6 m/s (b) the train's acceleration is 0.79 m/s². Answer: (a) 28.6 m/s; (b) 0.79 m/s². Length of the answer: 274 words.
Given that a train has a length of 92.7 m and starts from rest with a constant acceleration at time t=0 s.
At this instant, a car just reaches the end of the train.
The car is moving with a constant velocity.
At a time t=8.12 s, the car just reaches the front of the train.
Ultimately, however, the train pulls ahead of the car, and at time t=35.9 s, the car is again at the rear of the train.
We are supposed to find the magnitudes of (a) the car's velocity and (b) the train's acceleration.
(a) Calculation of car's velocity :Let's assume that the car's velocity is v₀.
So, the length covered by the car in 8.12 s is 92.7 m + length of the train covered by it.
Distance covered by car in 8.12 s = 92.7 m + 8.12 s v₀ ---- (i)
Again, at time t=35.9 s, the car is again at the rear of the train.
So, let's assume that car moves for t seconds from t = 8.12 s till the time it again reaches the rear of the train.
Distance covered by the car in (t) seconds = distance covered by train in (t-8.12) seconds (since car was already moving with a constant velocity)
92.7 + t v₀ = (1/2) a (t-8.12)² + (v₀ + at - 8.12) (t-8.12) ---- (ii)
Solving equations (i) and (ii) by eliminating t, we get:
v₀ = 28.6 m/s (approx)
Therefore, the car's velocity is 28.6 m/s.
(b) Calculation of train's acceleration:
At time t = 8.12 seconds, the car just reaches the front of the train.
Distance covered by the car in 8.12
s = distance covered by the train in 8.12 s(92.7 + 8.12 v₀)
= (1/2) a (8.12)²
Hence, the acceleration of the train (a) is 0.79 m/s².
Therefore, (a) the car's velocity is 28.6 m/s (b) the train's acceleration is 0.79 m/s². Answer: (a) 28.6 m/s; (b) 0.79 m/s². Length of the answer: 274 words.
To know more about length viist;
brainly.com/question/32060888
#SPJ11
When jumping, a flea reaches a takeoff speed of 1.3 m/s over a distance of 0.51 mm. What is the flea's acceleration during the jump phase?(Meters per sec)
How long does the acceleration phase last? (in seconds)
If the flea jumps straight up, how high will it go? ((Ignore air resistance for this problem; in reality, air resistance plays a large role, and the flea will not reach this height.) (in meters))
When the flea jumps straight up, it will reach a maximum height using the kinematic equation h = (v²) / (2g). The maximum height is approximately 0.087 meters.
To find the flea's acceleration during the jump phase, we can use the equation of motion:
v² = u² + 2as
where v is the final velocity (takeoff speed),
u is the initial velocity (0 m/s since the flea starts from rest),
a is the acceleration, and
s is the distance jumped.
Rearranging the equation, we get:
a = (v² - u²) / (2s)
Plugging in the given values, we have:
a = (1.3 m/s)² / (2 * 0.51 mm)
Converting the distance from millimeters to meters, we get:
a ≈ 3382 m/s²
Therefore, the flea's acceleration during the jump phase is approximately 3382 m/s².
To calculate the duration of the acceleration phase, we can use the equation:
t = 2s / v
Plugging in the values, we have:
t = 2 * 0.51 mm / 1.3 m/s
Converting the distance from millimeters to meters, we get:
t ≈ 0.393 seconds
Thus, the acceleration phase lasts approximately 0.393 seconds.
When the flea jumps straight up, we can use the kinematic equation:
h = (v²) / (2g)
where h is the height, v is the takeoff speed, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s²).
Plugging in the given takeoff speed, we have:
h = (1.3 m/s)² / (2 * 9.8 m/s²)
Calculating the height, we find:
h ≈ 0.087 meters
Therefore, when the flea jumps straight up, it will reach a maximum height of approximately 0.087 meters.
To know more about velocity, click here-
brainly.com/question/80295
#SPJ11
For the following circuit, find the branch current \( i_{a} \) :
The voltage across the 15-ohm resistor is zero, which means no current flows through it. As a result, the branch current \(i_a\) is also zero.
To find the branch current \(i_a\) in the given circuit, we need to apply Kirchhoff's laws and solve for the currents.
Using Kirchhoff's current law (KCL) at the node where the current source and resistors are connected, we can write the equation:
\[
I_1 + I_a - I_2 = 0
\]
where \(I_1\) is the current through the 10-ohm resistor, \(I_a\) is the branch current, and \(I_2\) is the current through the 15-ohm resistor.
Next, we can use Ohm's law to express the currents in terms of voltage and resistance. Since the voltage across the resistors is given, we can write:
\[
\frac{V_1}{10} + \frac{V_2}{15} - \frac{V}{20} = 0
\]
where \(V_1\) is the voltage across the 10-ohm resistor, \(V_2\) is the voltage across the 15-ohm resistor, and \(V\) is the given voltage source.
Now, we can substitute the given values into the equations:
\[
\frac{6}{10} + \frac{V_2}{15} - \frac{12}{20} = 0
\]
Simplifying the equation:
\[
\frac{6}{10} + \frac{V_2}{15} - \frac{12}{20} = 0
\]
\[
\frac{6}{10} + \frac{V_2}{15} = \frac{12}{20}
\]
\[
\frac{V_2}{15} = \frac{12}{20} - \frac{6}{10}
\]
\[
\frac{V_2}{15} = \frac{12}{20} - \frac{12}{20}
\]
\[
\frac{V_2}{15} = 0
\]
Therefore, the voltage across the 15-ohm resistor is zero, which means no current flows through it. As a result, the branch current \(i_a\) is also zero.
Hence, the numerical value of the branch current \(i_a\) is 0 Amps.
Learn more about Kirchhoff's laws from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/6417513
#SPJ11
A car cruising at 32 m/s toward to east comes to a stop in 26 seconds. What acceleration does the car experience, and which direction is the acceleration?
A 10Ohm resistor and a 1mH inductance coil are connected in parallel to the terminals of a regulated constant current source. After a while the current source is switched off but the ends of the resistor and the ends of the coil remain connected with each other. How long in units of ms does it take for the current through the coil to drop from 90% to 10% of the maximum current?
To determine the time it takes for the current through the coil to drop from 90% to 10% of the maximum current, we need to consider the time constant of the RL parallel circuit formed by the resistor and the inductance coil.
The time constant (τ) of an RL circuit is given by the formula:
τ = L / R
τ = (0.001H) / 10Ω
= 0.0001 seconds
The time constant is 0.0001 seconds or 0.1 ms (milliseconds).
To determine the time it takes for the current through the coil to drop from 90% to 10% of the maximum current, we need to find the time it takes for the current to decrease by a factor of 10.
The time it takes for the current to decrease by a factor of 10 is approximately equal to 2.3 times the time constant (τ).
Therefore, the time it takes for the current to drop from 90% to 10% is:
t = 2.3 * τ
= 2.3 * 0.1 ms
≈ 0.23 ms
So, it takes approximately 0.23 ms for the current through the coil to drop from 90% to 10% of the maximum current.
Learn more about current here : brainly.com/question/31315986
#SPJ11
There is a wall of house with thickness = 310mm, thermal conductivity Ab=0.6W/(m K). In the winter, indoor air temperature -24°C, surface heat transfer coefficient of convective heat transfer between indoor air and inner wall h=6W/(m² K); outdoor air temperature 12-8°C, surface heat transfer coefficient of convective heat transfer between outdoor air and exterior wall h2-9W/(m² K). If thermal radiation is not considered,
(1) Please try to calculate the heat transfer coefficient through the wall, heat transfer per unit area and the temperature at internal and external wall surface;
(2) If the inner wall surface is added with a thickness of 10mm, 2w=0.4w/ (m K) wall protection plate, other conditions remain unchanged, and then calculate the heat transfer coefficient through the wall, heat transfer per unit area and the temperature at internal and external wall surface.
.Heat transfer coefficient through the wall, heat transfer per unit area and the temperature at internal and external wall surface, if the inner wall surface is added with a thickness of 10 mm, 2w = 0.4 W/(m K) wall protection plate, other conditions remain unchanged.
:R = L / (k * A)
where L is the thickness of the wall, k is the thermal conductivity, and A is the area of the wall.
R = 0.31 / (0.6 * 1)
= 0.52 °C / W
The overall heat transfer coefficient of the wall can be calculated as:
1 / U = (1 / h) + R + (1 / h2)1 / U
= (1 / 6) + 0.52 + (1 / 9)U
= 3.37 W / (m² K)
The heat transfer per unit area can be calculated as:q = U * (Ti - To)q
= 3.37 * (24 + 273 - (-8 + 273))q
= 891.6 W / m²
The temperature at the internal and external surfaces of the wall can be calculated as:
Ti - T1 = q / hTi
= q / h + T1Ti
= 891.6 / 6 + (-24)Ti
= -3.9 °CTo - T2
= q / h2To
= q / h2 + T2To
= 891.6 / 9 + 12To
= 101.8 °C
2) Calculation of heat transfer coefficient through the wall, heat transfer per unit area and the temperature at internal and external wall surface, if the inner wall surface is added with a thickness of 10mm,
2w=0.4w/ (m K)
wall protection plate, other conditions remain unchanged.The new thermal resistance of the wall can be calculated as:R2 = (L1 + L2) / (k * A)R2
= (0.31 + 0.01) / (0.4 * 1)R2
= 0.8 °C / W
The new overall heat transfer coefficient of the wall can be calculated as:
1 / U2 = (1 / h) + R2 + (1 / h2)1 / U2
= (1 / 6) + 0.8 + (1 / 9)U2
= 1.74 W / (m² K)
The new heat transfer per unit area can be calculated as:
q2 = U2 * (Ti - To)q2
= 1.74 * (24 + 273 - (-8 + 273))q2
= 458.4 W / m²
The new temperature at the internal and external surfaces of the wall can be calculated as
:Ti2 - T12 = q2 / hTi2
= q2 / h + T1Ti2
= 458.4 / 6 + (-24)Ti2
= -3.6 °CTo2 - T22
= q2 / h2To2
= q2 / h2 + T2To2
= 458.4 / 9 + 12To2
= 60.4 °C H
To know more about wall visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14806248
#SPJ11
A projectile is launched from a height of 0.5 above ground level at an angle of 34 degree relative to horizontal with an initial speed of 13.8 meters per second. What is its y-position when x = 7 meters? Make sure to round your answer to 1 decimal place.
To determine the y-position of a projectile launched, we can use the equations of projectile motion. we get y = (13.8 m/s × sin(34°)) × t - (1/2) × (9.8 m/s²) × t².
To find the y-position of the projectile when x = 7 meters, we need to analyze the projectile motion. The initial velocity can be split into its horizontal and vertical components using trigonometry.
The horizontal component of the initial velocity is given by v_x = v × cos(θ), where v is the initial speed and θ is the launch angle. Substituting the values, we get v_x = 13.8 m/s × cos(34°).
The vertical component of the initial velocity is given by v_y = v × sin(θ), which becomes v_y = 13.8 m/s × sin(34°).
Since there is no vertical acceleration, the time taken to reach x = 7 meters horizontally will be the same as the time taken to reach the corresponding y-position.
Using the equation x = v_x × t, we can solve for t. Thus, t = x / v_x.
Substituting the given values, we have t = 7 m / (13.8 m/s × cos(34°)).
Now that we have the time, we can find the vertical displacement using the equation y = v_y × t - (1/2) × g × t², where g is the acceleration due to gravity.
Plugging in the values, we get y = (13.8 m/s × sin(34°)) × t - (1/2) × (9.8 m/s²) × t²
Finally, by substituting the calculated value of t, we can find the y-position of the projectile when x = 7 meters. Rounding the answer to one decimal place will provide the final result.
To learn more about projectile, click here brainly.com/question/2818076
#SPJ11
A string driven at a frequency of 120 Hz is observed to have a standing wave with 3 anti-nodes. What driving frequency, in
Hz
, will set up a standing wave with 6 anti-nodes?
The driving frequency needed to set up a standing wave with 6 anti-nodes is 240 Hz.
Standing waves are formed when waves traveling in opposite directions interfere with each other. The nodes are the points of minimum displacement, while the anti-nodes are the points of maximum displacement. The number of anti-nodes in a standing wave is directly proportional to the driving frequency.
In this case, the string is observed to have a standing wave with 3 anti-nodes at a frequency of 120 Hz. To determine the driving frequency required for 6 anti-nodes, we can use the relationship that the frequency is directly proportional to the number of anti-nodes.
Therefore, if the frequency is doubled, the number of anti-nodes will also double. Hence, to set up a standing wave with 6 anti-nodes, the driving frequency needs to be twice the frequency of the observed standing wave, which is 240 Hz.
To learn more about Anti-nodes, click on:
brainly.com/question/30893150
#SPJ11
n this problem, you will try to use proportionality, instead of direct calculation, to scale the Earth values of g and weight to those appropriate for another planet. Earth has a mass of 1 Earth mass, a radius of 1 Earth radius, and a surface gravity of 1g = 9.8 m / s2. If your mass is 68 kg, you would weigh 666 Newtons. The mass of WASP-96 b is 152.558 Earth masses, and it's radius is 13.428 Earth radii. Look at the surface gravity formula. Let's consider this in parts. If ONLY the mass changed, the surface gravity of WASP-96 b would be a times that of Earth. If ONLY the radius changed, the surface gravity of WASP-96 b would be times that of Earth. Combining the two factors, the surface gravity of must be times that of Earth. What would your weight be on WASP-96 b, if your weight is 666 on Earth? Newtons. Note: If your answer requires scientific notation, remember that OWL uses "e" notation: 1.1 x 105 is 1.1e5 to OWL.
Your weight on WASP-96 b would be approximately 167,900 Newtons.
To determine the weight on WASP-96 b, we can use the given information about the mass and radius of the planet compared to Earth. Let's go through the steps outlined in the problem:
1. The surface gravity formula can be written as:
g = G * (M / R^2),
where g is the surface gravity, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the planet, and R is the radius of the planet.
2. If ONLY the mass changed, the surface gravity of WASP-96 b would be "a" times that of Earth. Let's denote this factor as "a".
3. If ONLY the radius changed, the surface gravity of WASP-96 b would be "b" times that of Earth. Let's denote this factor as "b".
4. Combining the two factors, the surface gravity of WASP-96 b would be "a" times "b" times that of Earth.
5. We are given that the mass of WASP-96 b is 152.558 Earth masses, and the radius is 13.428 Earth radii. So, we can write:
a = 152.558 (mass factor)
b = 13.428 (radius factor)
6. The surface gravity of WASP-96 b is then:
g_b = a * b * g (where g = 9.8 m/s^2 on Earth)
7. To find the weight on WASP-96 b, we can use the formula:
Weight_b = mass * g_b
Now, let's calculate the weight on WASP-96 b:
Weight_b = 68 kg * (152.558 * 13.428 * 9.8 m/s^2)
Weight_b ≈ 68 * 152.558 * 13.428 * 9.8 N
Weight_b ≈ 1.679e5 N
Therefore, your weight on WASP-96 b would be approximately 167,900 Newtons.
Learn more about gravity formula here:
https://brainly.com/question/28033170
#SPJ11
A major leaguer hits a baseball so that it leaves the bat at a speed of 32.2 m/s and at an angle of 35.8∘ above the horizontal. You can ignore air resistance. apent id 32 . 2 mils and al an argis of 35 a * above the Part C X Incerect, Try Again: 4 attemptes remaining Part D A majur benger has a basobal so that a weres the toat at a speed of 37 m/k and at stanglo of 35,8 " above the berizintal You can ignore alr iessatance. hoced of 32.2 m/l and at an argh diss a " above hel horiontal Yoicmet ignore al resialioce - Part de
The time taken by the ball to reach the maximum height is 1.9 s. The v = 32.2 m/sθ = 35.8°. The horizontal distance travelled by the ball can be calculated using the horizontal component of the initial velocity:vx = v cos θvx = 32.2 cos 35.8°vx = 26.2 m/s.
The vertical distance travelled by the ball can be calculated using the vertical component of the initial velocity:vy = v sin θvy = 32.2 sin 35.8°vy = 18.7 m/s
Part C:
Time taken by the ball to reach the maximum height can be calculated using the formula:v = u + at where v = 0
(when the ball reaches the maximum height) and u = 18.7 m/s.a is the acceleration due to gravity and is equal to -9.8 m/s² since it acts in the opposite direction to the velocity.a = -9.8 m/s²0 = 18.7 + (-9.8)t
Solving for t, we get:t = 18.7/9.8t = 1.9 s.
Therefore, the time taken by the ball to reach the maximum height is 1.9 s.
Part D:
The maximum height reached by the ball can be calculated using the formula:v² = u² + 2as where v = 0
(when the ball reaches the maximum height), u = 18.7 m/s, a = -9.8 m/s², and s is the maximum height.
Solving for s, we get:s = u²/2a= (18.7)²/2(-9.8)= 17.9 m.
Therefore, the maximum height reached by the ball is 17.9 m.
Learn more about velocity here ;
https://brainly.com/question/30559316
#SPJ11
Show all works and explain the logic behind it. Intermittent windshield wipers use a variable resistor-one whose resistance changes as the control knob is rotated- in an \( R C \) circuit to set the delay between passes of the wipers. A typical cir
Intermittent windshield wipers utilize a variable resistor in an \( R C \) circuit to control the delay between passes of the wipers.
The circuit consists of a variable resistor (controlled by the knob), a capacitor, and a relay.
Here's how the circuit works:
1. When the control knob is adjusted, the resistance of the variable resistor changes. This alters the charging and discharging time of the capacitor.
2. Initially, the capacitor is fully discharged. As the wiper switch is turned on, the capacitor starts to charge through the variable resistor.
3. The rate at which the capacitor charges depends on the resistance set by the variable resistor. A higher resistance results in slower charging, which means a longer delay between wiper passes.
4. When the voltage across the capacitor reaches a certain threshold, the relay is activated. This causes the wipers to make a pass.
5. After the pass, the relay switches off, and the capacitor starts to discharge through the variable resistor.
6. Once the voltage across the capacitor drops below the threshold, the relay is deactivated, causing the wipers to stop until the cycle repeats.
By adjusting the variable resistor, the delay between wiper passes can be customized to suit different weather conditions. A higher resistance provides a longer delay, while a lower resistance shortens it.
In summary, the variable resistor in the \( R C \) circuit controls the charging and discharging time of the capacitor, which determines the delay between passes of the wipers.
Learn more about resistors from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/30672175
#SPJ11
Two tiny metal spheres A and B of mass m
A
=7.11 g and m
B
=10.2 g have equal positive charges q=6.67μC. The spheres are connected by a massless nonconducting string of length d=0.876 m, which is much greater than the radii of the spheres. (a) What is the electric potential energy of the system? Suppose you cut the string. At that instant, what is the acceleration of (b) sphere A and (c) sphere B ? A long time after you cut the string, what is the speed (d) sphere A and (e) sphere B? (a) Number Units (b) Number Units (c) Number Units (d) Number Units (e) Number Units
The electric potential energy of the system is
The acceleration of sphere A isa = [tex]F/m= (5.63\times10^{-2})/7.11\times10^{-3}= 7.92[/tex]m/s²
The acceleration of sphere B will be the same as the acceleration of sphere A, but in the opposite direction.
The speed of sphere A isv = u + at= 0 + 7.92×0.166= 1.31 m/s
The speed of sphere B will be the same as the speed of sphere A, but in the opposite direction.
(a) Electric potential energy of the system: We can calculate the electric potential energy of the system using the formula, U = q²/(4πε₀d)Where, q is the charge of each sphere, d is the separation distance between two spheres, and ε₀ is the permittivity of free space.
So, the electric potential energy of the system isU = [tex]6.67^{2} \times(10^{-6})^{2} /(4\times3.14\times8.85\times10^{-12}\times0.876)= 2.41\times10^{-3} J[/tex]
(b) Acceleration of sphere A:When the string is cut, the spheres will experience a force of attraction towards each other, so they will move towards each other.
We can calculate the acceleration of sphere A using the formula,F = maWhere, F is the force acting on sphere A due to the attraction with sphere B.
m is the mass of sphere A.a is the acceleration of sphere A.
So, the force acting on sphere A isF = k(q²/d²)= [tex](9\times10^9)\times(6.67\times10^-6)^{2} /(0.876)^{2} = 5.63\times10^{-2} N[/tex]
Thus, the acceleration of sphere A isa = F/m= [tex]F/m= (5.63\times10^{-2})/7.11\times10^{-3}= 7.92[/tex] m/s²
(c) Acceleration of sphere B:The acceleration of sphere B will be the same as the acceleration of sphere A, but in the opposite direction.
(d) Speed of sphere A:We can calculate the speed of sphere A using the formula, v = u + at Where, u is the initial velocity of sphere A, which is zero.
v is the final velocity of sphere A.
t is the time taken by sphere A to reach the final velocity.a is the acceleration of sphere A, which we have already calculated.
So, the time taken by sphere A to reach the final velocity ist = √(2d/a)= √(2×0.876/7.92)= 0.166 s
Thus, the speed of sphere A isv = u + at= 0 + 7.92×0.166= 1.31 m/s(e) Speed of sphere B:
The speed of sphere B will be the same as the speed of sphere A, but in the opposite direction.
For more questions on electric potential energy
https://brainly.com/question/26978411
#SPJ8
What happens to the potential difference between the parallel plates as the distance gets large? Is there a trend? For a large separation, we would expect the plates to behave like point charges. Do you observed this behavior? Explain why or why not. You may include a sketch.
The potential difference between the parallel plates decreases as the distance gets large and when the separation between plates get large, the plates behave like point charges as the effect of the electric field due to the edge of the plates is small.
The potential difference between parallel plates decreases as the distance between the plates increases. This trend is linear in nature. It means the potential difference between the parallel plates is inversely proportional to the distance between them.
When the separation between the plates becomes large, the plates behave like point charges. When the separation between the plates is large, the effect of the electric field due to the edge of the plates is small, and the field becomes homogeneous. Therefore, the electric field between the plates becomes uniform and the plates behave like point charges.
According to Coulomb’s law, the potential difference between two point charges is inversely proportional to the distance between them. We can apply this law to find the potential difference between parallel plates.
As we know, parallel plates are capacitors that store energy in an electric field. The electric field between the plates is directly proportional to the potential difference between the plates. Therefore, the potential difference between parallel plates is proportional to the electric field between the plates and inversely proportional to the distance between the plates.
When the separation between the plates becomes large, the electric field becomes homogeneous and the plates behave like point charges. This is because the effect of the electric field due to the edge of the plates is small.
Thus, the trend in potential difference is explained above.
To learn more about potential difference :
https://brainly.com/question/24142403
#SPJ11
A parallel-plate capacitor has capacitance C0=7.50pF when there is air between the plates. The separation between the plates is 1.90 mm. What is the maximum magnitude of charge that can be placed on each plate if the electic finld in the regon between the phistes is rot to exched a Express your answer with the appropriate units. Part B charge on each plate it the electric field between the plates is not to exceed 300×104 V/m ? Express your answer with the appropriate units.
For a parallel-plate capacitor with a capacitance of 7.50 pF and a plate separation of 1.90 mm, the maximum magnitude of charge that can be placed on each plate is 1.425 nC when the electric field is not to exceed 300×[tex]10^4[/tex] V/m.
The capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor is given by the formula C = ε₀A/d, where C is the capacitance, ε₀ is the permittivity of free space (ε₀ ≈ 8.85 × [tex]10^{-12[/tex] F/m), A is the area of each plate, and d is the separation between the plates.
In this case, the given capacitance is 7.50 pF (picofarads) and the plate separation is 1.90 mm (millimeters). To find the maximum charge that can be placed on each plate, we can rearrange the capacitance formula as Q = C⋅V, where Q is the charge and V is the voltage across the plates.
For part A, when the electric field is not to exceed 100×[tex]10^4[/tex] V/m, we can calculate the maximum voltage by rearranging the formula for electric field as E = V/d. Substituting the given electric field limit, we have V = E⋅d = (100×[tex]10^4[/tex] V/m) × (1.90 mm) = 190×[tex]10^4[/tex] V.
Plugging this value into the charge formula, we find Q = C⋅V = (7.50×[tex]10^{-12[/tex] F) × (190×[tex]10^4[/tex] V) = 1.425 nC.
For part B, when the electric field is not to exceed 300×[tex]10^4[/tex] V/m, we repeat the process and find V = E⋅d = (300×[tex]10^4[/tex] V/m) × (1.90 mm) = 570×[tex]10^4[/tex] V. Plugging this value into the charge formula, we obtain Q = C⋅V = (7.50×[tex]10^{-12[/tex] F) × (570×[tex]10^4[/tex] V) = 4.275 nC.
Learn more about capacitance here:
https://brainly.com/question/31871398
#SPJ11
2) Clearly explain how you will determine the projectile's initial velocity from your measurements in this experiment.
To determine the projectile's initial velocity from measurements in this experiment, the following steps can be taken:
Set up the experiment with the necessary equipmentMeasure the distance between the launcher and the target board.Launch the projectile and record the launch angle Measure the rangeCalculate the time of flight Determine the initial vertical velocity Calculate the vertical displacement of the projectile Calculate the initial vertical velocity using the equation: vertical displacement = initial vertical velocity * time - (0.5 * g * time^2).Account for the launch angle and combine the vertical and horizontal components of the velocityPerform the necessary calculations and measurementsTo determine the projectile's initial velocity from measurements in this experiment, the following steps can be taken:
Set up the experiment: Prepare the necessary equipment, including a projectile launcher, a measuring tape or ruler, and a target board or surface. Ensure that the launcher is securely positioned and aligned.Measure the distance: Determine the distance between the launcher and the target board. This measurement will be crucial for calculating the time of flight and other relevant parameters.Launch the projectile: Use the launcher to project the projectile towards the target board. Make sure to record the launch angle and any other relevant parameters.Measure the range: Measure the horizontal distance covered by the projectile from the launch point to the point of impact on the target board. This can be done using the measuring tape or ruler.Calculate the time of flight: Using the measured distance and the known acceleration due to gravity (g ≈ 9.8 m/s^2), calculate the time of flight of the projectile. This can be done using the formula: time = square root of (2 * range / g).Determine the initial vertical velocity: Since the projectile follows a parabolic trajectory, the initial vertical velocity can be determined by analyzing the vertical motion. The vertical displacement of the projectile can be calculated using the formula: vertical displacement = (0.5 * g * time^2).Calculate the initial velocity: Once the vertical displacement and time of flight are known, the initial vertical velocity can be determined by rearranging the equation: vertical displacement = initial vertical velocity * time - (0.5 * g * time^2).Account for the launch angle: Finally, to find the initial velocity of the projectile, the vertical and horizontal components of the velocity need to be combined. This can be done by using the launch angle and the initial vertical velocity to calculate the initial velocity vector.By following these steps and performing the necessary calculations, the initial velocity of the projectile can be determined from the measurements obtained in the experiment.
For more such questions on projectile's initial velocity, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/20790799
#SPJ8
rare butterfly (0.01 kg) is slowly flapping its wings and moving across a road. An unsuspecting driver in a large car of mass 1000 kg going very fast (52 m/s) makes a sharp turn and runs directly into the butterfly (speed is basically 0 m/s). The butterfly smashes against the windshield of course but the car keeps moving down the road. Which object has the greater force: The butterfly or the car? Make sure you answer the question and justify your answer as to why you think this.
While the butterfly may be rare and fragile, it does not have a great enough mass to exert a significant force in a collision with a large, fast-moving object like a car. The car has a much greater mass, and therefore a much greater force, than the butterfly.
The car exerts a greater force than the butterfly in this scenario. This is because force is determined by the mass of an object and the acceleration that is applied to it, as defined by Newton's second law of motion. F=ma, where F is force, m is mass, and a is acceleration.
In this situation, the car has a much greater mass than the butterfly, which means that it requires a greater force to accelerate or decelerate it compared to the butterfly.Therefore, when the car hits the butterfly, it applies a force that is much greater than the force that the butterfly applies back.
The butterfly's force is so small that it is negligible compared to the car's force. Additionally, the car is traveling at a high speed, which increases its momentum and therefore the force it exerts on the butterfly when it hits it. This is due to the fact that force and momentum are directly proportional to one another.
In summary, while the butterfly may be rare and fragile, it does not have a great enough mass to exert a significant force in a collision with a large, fast-moving object like a car. The car has a much greater mass, and therefore a much greater force, than the butterfly.
For more such questions on butterfly, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/22952049
#SPJ8
Both the car and the butterfly exert equal force on each other according to Newton's Third Law of Motion. However, due to the car's significantly larger mass and speed, the effect of this force is drastically different for the two objects.
Explanation:The force applied by the butterfly and the car on each other will be equal according to Newton's Third Law of Motion. This law states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. So, when the car hits the butterfly, the butterfly also applies an equal force back to the car.
However, because of the vast difference in the mass and speed (momentum) of the car and the butterfly (nearly 0 for the butterfly), the impact of this force on the butterfly will be far more severe, causing it to smash against the windshield, but it won't affect the car to any noticeable extent.
Learn more about Newton's Third Law of Motion here:https://brainly.com/question/2057822
#SPJ2
On a fishing trip, you catch a 2.33 lb bass, a 12.2lb rock cod, and a14.53 lb saimon. Part A What is the total weight of your catch?
The total weight of your catch is 29.06 pounds.
Weight is the force exerted on an object due to the gravitational pull of the Earth or any other celestial body. It is a measure of the mass of an object multiplied by the acceleration due to gravity.
The total weight of your catch can be calculated by adding the weights of the individual fish.
Weight of the bass: 2.33 lb
Weight of the rock cod: 12.2 lb
Weight of the saimon: 14.53 lb
To find the total weight, add these weights together:
Total weight = 2.33 lb + 12.2 lb + 14.53 lb
Total weight = 29.06 lb.
To know more about weight
brainly.com/question/31609928
#SPJ11
Blythe and Geoff are ice skating together. Blythe has a mass of 46.0 kg, and Geoff has a mass of 80.0 kg. Blythe pushes Geoff in the chest when both are at rest, causing Geoff to move away at a speed of 4.00 m/s. What is Blythe's speed vB after she pushes Geoff? v Bn/s
Blythe's mass, mB = 46.0 kgGeoff's mass, mG = 80.0 kgGeoff's initial velocity, uG = 0 m/sGeoff's final velocity, vG = 4.00 m/sWe are to calculate Blythe's speed vB after she pushes GeoffThe solution to the problem involves the application of the law of conservation of momentum which states that the total momentum of a closed system remains constant if no external forces act on it.
Main answerThe law of conservation of momentum is given as;Σp before = Σp afterwhere Σp before is the total momentum before collision and Σp after is the total momentum after collisionThe momentum, p is given as;p = mvwhere p is momentum, m is mass, and v is velocity Let the velocity of Blythe be vBΣp before = Σp after(mBvB + mGuG) = (mBvB1 + mGvG1)where vB1 is the velocity of Blythe after collisionSolving for vB1;vB1 = (mBvB + mGuG - mGvG1)/mBNow,
vG1 is the velocity of Geoff after collision given as;vG1 = (mGuG + mBvB1)/mGWe can substitute the expression for vB1 into the expression for vG1 and simplify to obtain;vG1 = (mGuG + mB(mBvB + mGuG - mGvG1)/mB)/mGvG1 = [(mGuG) + (mB^2vB) + (mBuG) - (mBmGvG1)]/(mGmB)We can solve for vB as follows;(mBvB + mGuG) = (mBvB1 + mGvG1)46vB + (80 × 0) = (46 × vB1 + 80vG1)46vB = (46 × vB1 + 80vG1)vB = (46vB1 + 80vG1)/, the speed of Blythe vB after she pushes Geoff is given by;vB = (46vB1 + 80vG1)/46
TO know more about that mass visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14651380
#SPJ11
Now let's figure out if I can observe the binary companion to Sirius (and I'm going to ignore any challenges related to the relative brightness of the two objects). If I were to observe at the peak wavelength of Sirius A calcu- lated in part (a), and I have a diffraction limited telescope, how big does it need to be to resolve this binary?
D ≈ 0.055 meters or 55 mm
Therefore, to resolve the binary companion to Sirius at the peak wavelength of Sirius A, a telescope with a diameter of approximately 55 mm would be needed.
To determine the size of the telescope needed to resolve the binary companion to Sirius, we need to consider the concept of angular resolution. Angular resolution refers to the ability of a telescope to distinguish between two closely spaced objects.
The formula for angular resolution is given by:
θ = 1.22 * (λ/D)
Where θ is the angular resolution, λ is the wavelength of light, and D is the diameter of the telescope.
In this case, we are observing at the peak wavelength of Sirius A calculated in part (a). Let's assume the peak wavelength is λ = 550 nm (nanometers).
To calculate the size of the telescope required to resolve the binary, we need to determine the angular resolution needed. We can assume that the angular separation between the binary companions is around 1 arcsecond.
Using the formula for angular resolution, we can rearrange it to solve for D:
D = 1.22 * (λ/θ)
Substituting the values, we get:
D = 1.22 * (550 nm / 1 arcsecond)
Now, let's convert nm to meters and arcseconds to radians:
1 nm = 10⁻⁹ meters
1 arcsecond = (π/180)*(1/3600) radians
D = 1.22 * (550 * 10⁻⁹ meters / (1 * (π/180)*(1/3600) radians))
Simplifying further, we get:
D = 1.22 * (550 * 10⁻⁹ meters / (π/648,000) radians)
D ≈ 0.055 meters or 55 mm
Therefore, to resolve the binary companion to Sirius at the peak wavelength of Sirius A, a telescope with a diameter of approximately 55 mm would be needed.
To know more about wavelength visit:
brainly.com/question/31143857
#SPJ11
body mass index is body weight relative to height.
The body mass index (BMI) is the measure of an individual's body weight relative to their height.
Body mass index:
Body mass index (BMI) is determined by dividing the body weight of the individual (in kilograms) by their height (in meters) squared.
The formula for calculating BMI is as follows:
BMI = body weight (kg) / height² (m²)
Where, BMI is the body mass index, the body weight is the weight of the individual in kilograms, and the height is the height of the individual in meters.
Body mass index is a numerical value that is used to classify individuals into different weight categories such as underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese.
These weight categories are determined by the following BMI ranges:
Underweight: BMI less than 18.5
Normal weight: BMI between 18.5 and 24.9
Overweight: BMI between 25 and 29.9
Obese: BMI greater than or equal to 30BMI is a useful tool in determining the weight status of an individual and can be used to monitor their weight over time.
It is important to note, however, that BMI is not a perfect measure of body fatness and should be used in conjunction with other measures such as waist circumference and body composition to get a more accurate picture of an individual's overall health.
Therefore, the body mass index (BMI) calculates a person's weight in relation to their height.
To learn more about body mass index from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/2064513
#SPJ11
Use the Luminosity Distance Formula. You measure the apparent brightness of a particular star to be \( 3.3 \times 10^{-10} \) watt \( / \mathrm{m}^{2} \). A parallax measurement shows the star's dista
The Luminosity Distance of the star is approximately [tex]\(1.02 \times 10^{27} \text{ m}\).[/tex]
The Luminosity Distance Formula is given by:
[tex]\[D_L = \sqrt{\frac{L}{4\pi F}}\][/tex]
Where, L is the luminosity of the star and F is the flux density of the star as observed on Earth.
Let's substitute the values given in the problem to get the Luminosity Distance.
The apparent brightness of a particular star is measured to be[tex]\( 3.3 \times 10^{-10} \) watt/\( \mathrm{m}^{2} \).[/tex]
This is the flux density of the star as observed on Earth.
Let's substitute the value of flux density in the above equation.
So, we get:[tex]\[D_L = \sqrt{\frac{L}{4\pi \times 3.3 \times 10^{-10}}}\][/tex]
Now, let's determine the distance of the star from Earth using the Distance formula:
[tex]\[\text{Distance (d)}=\frac{1}{\text{Parallax Angle (p)}}\][/tex]
Where d is the distance of the star from Earth and p is the parallax angle.
Let's substitute the values given in the problem:
[tex]\[\text{d} = \frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{1000}}\][/tex]
Here, we have taken the parallax angle [tex]\(\pi\)[/tex] to be 1 milliarcsecond (1/1000 of a degree).
So, we get:
[tex]\[\text{d} = \frac{1000}{\pi} \text{ parsecs} \approx 318.3 \text{ parsecs}\][/tex]
Finally, let's substitute the values of L, F, and d in the Luminosity Distance Formula:
[tex]\[D_L = \sqrt{\frac{L}{4\pi F}}\]\[D_L = \sqrt{\frac{L}{4\pi \times 3.3 \times 10^{-10}}}\]\[D_L = \sqrt{\frac{L}{1.32 \times 10^{-9} \pi}}\]\[D_L = \sqrt{\frac{L}{4.146 \times 10^{-9}}}\][/tex]
Let's assume that the luminosity of the star is the same as that of the Sun, i.e.,[tex]\(L = 3.828 \times 10^{26} \text{ W}\).[/tex]
So, we get:
[tex]\[D_L = \sqrt{\frac{3.828 \times 10^{26}}{4.146 \times 10^{-9}}}\]\[D_L \approx 1.02 \times 10^{27} \text{ m}\][/tex]
So, the Luminosity Distance of the star is approximately [tex]\(1.02 \times 10^{27} \text{ m}\).[/tex]
Learn more about Luminosity Distance from the given link;
https://brainly.in/question/18473204
#SPJ11
Depending on the situation, a cell phone will project between 0.02 W and 2 W of radiowave radiation. While using your phone, you measure the output and find that your phone is producing radiowaves at a rate of 1.12 Watts. At a distance of 3 cm, what is the average intensity of these waves? W/m ^{2}Tries 0/2 What is the peak intensity of the wave at this distance?
W/m ^{2} Tries 0/2 Calculate the peak electric field strength E_0 in these waves.
∣N/C
Tries 0/2
Calculate the peak magnetic field strength B_0 in these waves. T ) Tries 0/2
As given, the power radiated by the cell phone is 1.12 W. The distance between the phone and point where the intensity is to be calculated is 3 cm.
Now, the average intensity of the waves can be calculated as:
Average Intensity = Power radiated per unit area= Power radiated / (4πr²)
Where, r is the distance between the phone and point where the intensity is to be calculated.
Thus, the average intensity of the radio waves is 0.83 W/m² (approximately).The peak intensity of the wave is four times the average intensity. Thus, the peak intensity of the wave is 3.32 W/m².The peak electric field strength can be calculated as:
E₀ = √(2I/μ₀c)
Where, I is the average intensity, c is the speed of light and μ₀ is the permeability of free space.
Thus, substituting the values of I, c and μ₀, we get:
E₀ = 9.4×10⁻⁴ N/C (approximately).The peak magnetic field strength can be calculated as:
B₀ = √(2I/ε₀c)Where, ε₀ is the permittivity of free space.
Thus, substituting the values of I, c and ε₀, we get:
B₀ = 2.4×10⁻⁵ T (approximately).
Therefore, the average intensity of these waves is 0.83 W/m², the peak intensity of the wave at this distance is 3.32 W/m², the peak electric field strength E₀ in these waves is 9.4×10⁻⁴ N/C and the peak magnetic field strength B₀ in these waves is 2.4×10⁻⁵ T.
To know more about power visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29575208
#SPJ11
point A rocket burns fuel to exert a force of downward thrust, which propels it into the sky. How much thrust is needed to launch a 667,267 kg rocket? Provide your answer in MN. (assume the force of thrust is just enough to overcome the weight of the rocket)
Approximately 6.5312 meganewtons (MN) of thrust is needed to launch the 667,267 kg rocket, assuming the force of thrust is just enough to overcome the weight of the rocket.
To determine the amount of thrust needed to launch a rocket, we need to consider Newton's second law of motion, which states that force (F) is equal to mass (m) multiplied by acceleration (a): F = m * a. In this case, the force required is the upward thrust needed to overcome the weight of the rocket, which is equal to the gravitational force acting on it. The gravitational force is given by the formula: F_gravity = m * g, where g represents the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s^2 on Earth). So, to launch the rocket, we need a thrust equal to its weight, which is F_thrust = m * g. Given that the mass of the rocket (m) is 667,267 kg, we can calculate the thrust required: F_thrust = 667,267 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 6,531,241.6 N.To convert this value to meganewtons (MN), we divide by 1 million: F_thrust = 6,531,241.6 N / 1,000,000 = 6.5312 MN. Therefore, approximately 6.5312 meganewtons (MN) of thrust is needed to launch the 667,267 kg rocket, assuming the force of thrust is just enough to overcome the weight of the rocket.
To learn more about force:
https://brainly.com/question/13191643
#SPJ11
In a stunt fimed for a move, a van rolls down an incline and off a vertical cliff, falling into a valley beic.w. The van skarts from rest and rolts down the incline, which makes an angle of 23.0
∘
below the horizontal, with a constant acceleration of 3.67 m/s
2
. After rolling down the incline a distance of 55.0 m, it reaches the edge of the eliff, which is 40.0 m above ground level. (b) How much ume (in s) does it take the van to fall from the edge of the eliff to the landing point? स. First, find the velocity at the end of the incline, just before the van leaves the cliff. Note this is one dimensional motion, and the acceieration is given. Then, use this to find the initial vertical component of velocity for the free fall phase of the motien. What is the vertical displacement for this phase? What is the acceleration? Be careful with signs, s (b) At the point where the van crashes into the ground, how far is it horizontally trom the edge of the ciff ( in m)? From the angie and the speed at the end of the incline, what is the norizontal component of the velocity doring free fail? use this and the time found above to find the horizontat displacement, m
The van reaches a velocity of approximately 201.85 m/s at the end of the incline, falls with an initial vertical velocity of approximately 76.89 m/s, and takes approximately 7.26 s to fall from the edge of the cliff, traveling a horizontal distance of approximately 1366.49 m and landing approximately 1311.49 m away from the edge of the cliff.
Angle of incline, θ = 23°
Distance traveled by the van on the incline, s = 55.0 m
Height of the cliff, h = 40.0 m
Acceleration, a = 3.67 m/s²
(a) To find the velocity at the end of the incline, we use the equation:
v = u + at
Since the van starts from rest (u = 0), the equation simplifies to:
v = at
Substituting the values, we have:
v = 3.67 m/s² * 55.0 m
v ≈ 201.85 m/s (rounded to two decimal places)
The initial vertical component of velocity for the free fall phase is equal to the vertical component of the velocity at the end of the incline, which is:
v_y = v * sin(θ) ≈ 201.85 m/s * sin(23°) ≈ 76.89 m/s (rounded to two decimal places)
The vertical displacement for this phase can be calculated using the equation:
h = u_y * t + (1/2) * a * t²
Since the initial vertical velocity (u_y) is 76.89 m/s and the vertical displacement (h) is -40.0 m (negative due to downward motion), we can solve for time (t):
-40.0 m = 76.89 m/s * t + (1/2) * (-9.8 m/s²) * t²
Solving the quadratic equation, we find two possible solutions for t:
t ≈ 2.15 s or t ≈ 7.26 s
However, we select the positive value of time, which is approximately t ≈ 7.26 s (rounded to two decimal places).
(b) The horizontal distance traveled during free fall can be calculated using the equation:
s_x = v_x * t = v * cos(θ) * t
Substituting the values, we have:
s_x = 201.85 m/s * cos(23°) * 7.26 s ≈ 1366.49 m (rounded to two decimal places)
The horizontal distance of the van from the edge of the cliff is the distance traveled on the incline minus the horizontal distance traveled during free fall:
horizontal distance = 55.0 m - 1366.49 m ≈ -1311.49 m (rounded to two decimal places)
Therefore, the van is approximately 1311.49 m away from the edge of the cliff (in the opposite direction).
Learn more about velocity at: https://brainly.com/question/80295
#SPJ11
Three point charges of values q1 = -5C, q2 = 7C, and q3 = -1C are located at the points P1(7, 3, 5), P2(12, 4, 3), and P3 (6, -3, 2), respectively.
a. Find the electric field at an arbitrary point (i.e., Express the net E-field as a function of the coordinate variables)
b. Find the electric field at P(1, 2, 3)
Plug in the coordinates (1, 2, 3) into the expressions for E1, E2, and E3, and calculate the values of E1, E2, and E3. Then add them up to find E_net at P(1, 2, 3).
a. To find the electric field at an arbitrary point, we need to calculate the contribution from each point charge and then sum them up.
The electric field at a point due to a point charge is given by Coulomb's Law:
E = k * (q / r^2) * r_hat
where E is the electric field vector, k is the electrostatic constant (k = 9 × 10^9 Nm^2/C^2), q is the charge of the point charge, r is the distance from the point charge to the point of interest, and r_hat is the unit vector in the direction from the point charge to the point of interest.
Let's calculate the electric field due to each point charge and sum them up:
For q1 at P1(7, 3, 5):
r1 = sqrt((x - 7)^2 + (y - 3)^2 + (z - 5)^2)
r1_hat = ((x - 7) / r1, (y - 3) / r1, (z - 5) / r1)
E1 = k * (q1 / r1^2) * r1_hat
Similarly, for q2 at P2(12, 4, 3):
r2 = sqrt((x - 12)^2 + (y - 4)^2 + (z - 3)^2)
r2_hat = ((x - 12) / r2, (y - 4) / r2, (z - 3) / r2)
E2 = k * (q2 / r2^2) * r2_hat
And for q3 at P3(6, -3, 2):
r3 = sqrt((x - 6)^2 + (y + 3)^2 + (z - 2)^2)
r3_hat = ((x - 6) / r3, (y + 3) / r3, (z - 2) / r3)
E3 = k * (q3 / r3^2) * r3_hat
The net electric field, E_net, is the sum of E1, E2, and E3:
E_net = E1 + E2 + E3
b. To find the electric field at P(1, 2, 3), substitute the values of x, y, and z into the expressions for E_net that we derived in part a.:
E_net = E1 + E2 + E3
To know more about coordinates visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32836021
#SPJ11
two punctual charges equal to Q are situated on the y axis. On y = a and y=-a.
A) What is the electrical force exerted on a charge q situated at (x,0)
B) Using calculus (differential) calculate x when the module of the force is max
The x value when the module of the force is max is [tex]a / \sqrt[3]{2}[/tex].
Given conditions:
Two punctual charges equal to Q are situated on the y-axis.
On y = a and -a. Let the distance between any point on the y-axis and the point of charge be x.
The electrical force exerted on a charge q situated at (x,0) is
[tex]F = k q Q / x^2[/tex]
The force vector for a charge q is directed along the x-axis.
If the force F is the greatest for a certain value of x, then the derivative of F with respect to x equals zero:
[tex]F' = -2 k q Q / x^3[/tex]
= 0
=> [tex]x =\sqrt[3]{2 k q Q} / F(x)[/tex]
Here, k is Coulomb's constant,
q and Q are charge values.
We have also stated that the force vector is directed along the x-axis. A possible method of solving the problem is to add the contribution of forces from two charges to determine the overall electrical force F acting on charge q.
Find the electrical force acting on charge q.
Let's calculate the electric force acting on a unit charge located at point P = (x, 0, 0) by the charge located at the point A = (0, a, 0).
F1 = (kqQ / (a² + x²))i
Let's calculate the electric force acting on a unit charge located at point P = (x, 0, 0) by the charge located at the point B = (0, -a, 0).
F2 = (kqQ / (a² + x²))i
We get the resultant force by adding F1 and F2:
F = F1 + F2
= 2(kqQ / (a² + x²))i
The expression of the electrical force on charge q becomes:
F = (2 k q Q / x^2)i
To find the maximum value of F, we'll differentiate the expression of F with respect to x and equate the derivative to zero:
(dF/dx) = (-4 k q Q / x^3)i
=0
=> [tex]x = \sqrt[3]{2 k q Q / F(x)}[/tex]
Therefore, [tex]x = \sqrt[3]{2 k q Q} ) / (2 k q Q / a^2)[/tex]
[tex]=a / \sqrt[3]{2}[/tex]
Thus, the x value when the module of the force is max is [tex]a / \sqrt[3]{2}[/tex].
To know more about force visit
https://brainly.com/question/30507236
#SPJ11
