Answer:
No. The Plaintiff should re-file with more substantiating evidence.
13. About how many teen drivers were killed in motor vehicle crahes in the
United States over the past decade?
Answer:
An average of nine teens ages 16-19 were killed every day from motor vehicle injuries. 2,739 drivers ages 15-20 were killed and an additional 228,000 were injured in crashes. A total of 4,054 teens between the ages of 13-19 died in car accidents
Explanation:
Why is the labor force participation rate important to an economy? How has the labor force
participation rate changed over time in the US? What are some major economic and
demographic trends that have affected it?
Explanation:
After trending up for more than three decades, the labor force participation rate peaked at 67.3 percent in early 2000. Over the next few years, the rate receded to about 66 percent and stayed at that level through 2008. The participation rate then dropped again, and by mid-2016, it stood at 62.7 percent.
How a bill becomes Law in Canada?
Answer:
they go through the canadian government
Explanation:
What is the difference between conservative and Liberal Supreme Court Justices?
Each Justice of the United States Supreme Court has four law clerks. Law clerks are recent law school graduates who serve for one year as a legal assistant to a Supreme Court Justice. Law clerks are very important to the work of the Court. In each chamber, the Justice and the four clerks form a close-knit intellectual family. It is with their law clerks that Justices are able to speak openly and to engage in a candid give-and-take, testing ideas, theories and approaches as they consider the merits of each case. Moreover, in most chambers the law clerks play a central role in preparing drafts of a Justice's opinions.
A homeowner filed a federal diversity action against the manufacturer of a pressure cooker for a products liability action based on state law, alleging that she was severely burned because the top flew off the pressure cooker during operation. Under the state law, a jury verdict does not have to be unanimous. However, a specific rule under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure directly conflicts with the state law and provides that jury verdicts in federal court must be unanimous. Which statement correctly presents what law the federal judge should apply regarding the jury verdict
Answer:
The federal rule must apply in this case.
Explanation:
A federal court must, in fact, apply to state law when it has a case that was initiated under state law. However, when this case is also based on diversity of citizenship, a federal statute, or a federal rule, as shown in the case above, the court must apply the federal rule, provided that procedural rule does not interfere or deny any right, as shown in the case of the question above. Therefore, the court must apply federal rule.
While in a department store, a man picked up a sweater and slipped it under his shirt. The man then started for the door. A woman, who also was shopping in the store, saw the man take the sweater. The woman grabbed a baseball bat from the sporting goods aisle and chased the man into the parking lot. The woman began swinging the bat at the man's head, hoping to knock him out and thus prevent the theft. The man pulled a knife from his pocket and stabbed the woman, killing her. The man was arrested and charged with murder. At trial, will the man most likely be found guilty
Answer:
D). No, because the man was acting in self-defense.
Explanation:
In the given situation, the man would not be considered guilty of murdering the woman and this is because the action took place when was defending himself from the attacks made by that woman on him. However, the man was attempting to steal the sweater at the store yet the deadly attack made by the woman on his head with the baseball bat cannot be justified in any case. Her act would be categorized under 'dangerous felony' and therefore, the use of a knife by the man was enforced on him to save himself. Hence, the action was in 'self-defense' and he will not be punished for it as it was the woman who initiated the physical violence and harm and he just reacted. Thus, option D is the correct answer.
A three-car accident occurred in a city in the Northern District of State A. The cars were driven by a citizen of State B who resides in the Southern District of State B, a citizen of State A who resides in the Southern District of State A, and a citizen of State C who resides in the Northern District of State C. The State B citizen filed a negligence action against the other two drivers in the United States District Court for the Southern District of State A. Although the two defendants believed that venue was improper, neither filed a pre-answer motion objecting to venue. They instead proceeded to file their answers, responding to the merits of the claim. The State C defendant, however, included in her answer a motion to dismiss the action for improper venue. How should the court rule on the State C defendant's motion to dismiss for imprope
Answer:
The motion should be granted, given that a defendant can raise objections to venue in their answer, where the Rule 12(b) pre-answer motion is not asserted by the defendant and that the venue is improper, given that the Southern District of State A is not the location of any of the events for which the claim is being made, and that one of the defendant is not a resident of State A
Explanation:
Read the quote and select the correct answer.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress
may from time to time ordain and establish.
-US Constitution Article III, Section
Answer:B
Explanation:See FISA Court
It's a secret Court for investigation of information technology that it is secret is counter to public good because it takes all transparency out of the dealings of our elected officials and strips the judicial of any oversite which is the intended function of the checks and balances system set up by the constitution. Our judicial review power has been systemically legislated to have no teeth. Because of the corrupt corporations and the bought politicians who care only for money and power instead of their constituents or the United States, our precious constitution is now a meaningless hollow document. So sad
In a state court of general jurisdiction in State A, a debtor, who was a resident of State A, brought suit against a lender, who was an alien with permanent residency status in State B, for violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The lender waived personal jurisdiction. Under state procedural rules, venue was proper in the state court. The lender timely removed the action to the federal court for the Northern District of State A, which was the district in which the state court sat. The lender then timely moved to dismiss the action for improper venue, noting that, had the action initially been brought in federal court, the federal court for the Northern District of State A would not have had proper venue over this action. How should the court rule on this motion
Answer:
Hi my name is dad
Explanation:
hey I'm trying to reachout for someone and that person knows who it is and if you see this message please, comment below and my question is Misdemeanors do not include any violent crimes or crimes with the potential to harm others.
Is the previous statement true or false?
Answer:
Your answer is False
Explanation:
mark Me brainliest if my answer Is correct
What is law ??
____________
Answer:
on my on definition law
Law is the rules and regulation guiding everyone
Answer:
Law is a system of rules created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior, with its precise definition a matter of longstanding debate..
Which situation always warrants calling 911 when someone is injured?
A. Moving the person may cause injury
B. A bone could be broken
C. The hospital is more than 10 miles away
D. You are alone with the injured person
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Can someone answer this pls
Select the correct answer.
Anya believes that a strong federal government is important to protect the environment and the rights of minorities. She also supports some government regulation of the economy. Which political party is the most closely aligned with Anya's beliefs?
A.
the Democratic Party
B.
The Libertarian Party
C.
the Constitution Party
D.
the Republican Party
A. The Democratic Party
The Democratic Party:
- believes that the government should protect the environment
- supports increased domestic renewable energy development
- strives for equality of opportunity for all Americans
- more willing to intervene in the economy (i.e., regulate businesses)
Verify that –(-x) is the same as x , for x = −4/5
Answer:
-4/5
Explanation:
it came be two possible answer for x
Explanation:
???
-(-x) = -1×(-1×x) = -1×(-1×-4/5) = -1×(4/5) = -4/5
therefore, yes, -(-x) = x
Which describes the Securities and Exchange Commission?
unconnected to
government
government corporation
government contractor
government agency
Answer:
Government agency.
Explanation:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is a federal agency of the government established to monitor and regulate the securities market. The SEC is tasked with regulating a fair and just functioning of the exchange market.
Created in 1934, the SEC helps regulate the market and protects investors from getting into the wrong business. And though it is a federal agency, it is also capable of bringing civil actions against any lawbreakers and any criminal cases that may be detrimental or dangerous for the country.
Thus, the correct answer is the fourth option.
You have been asked to draft a document related to evidence-gathering that contains details about personnel in possession and control of evidence from the time of discovery up through the time of presentation in court. Which type of document is this
Which laws or rules prevent or reduce injury in the event of a crash?
A. Passing rules
B. Signaling rules
C. Impaired-driving laws
D. Child seat laws
Answer:
D. Child seat laws
Explanation:
In a certain crashing events , the Child Seat Laws are safety laws to reduce injuries in car crashes.
Only ____ can reduce blood alcohol content (BAC) and alcohol's effects on the body.
Question 65
When boating in Texas, which of the following actions would be legal?
A
encircling boaters who are fishing
B
operating outside of restricted areas
С
riding on the back of a boat seat while underway
D
riding on a seat mounted on a raised deck while at full speed
Support
DOLL
While boating in Texas, the action that would be legal is operating outside of the restricted areas. Hence, Option B is the correct statement.
What is legal while running a vessel in Texas waters?To legally function a ship withinside the country of Texas, you have to reap a Texas Certificate of Number and validation decals.
There are certain exceptions that are Human-powered craft including canoes, kayaks, punts, rowboats, or rubber rafts (no matter length). Wind-powered sailboats below 14 ft in length.
Hence, Option B is the correct statement.
Learn more about Boating in Texas here:
https://brainly.com/question/23135833
#SPJ2
observe a farming system in your neighbourhood and write short notes on it.
Answer:
Observing farming activities around this neighborhood are poor and traditional type of farming because it is rural based.
Explanation:
Farming system around this neighborhood is traditional where there's a use of cow and donkeys. People tend to practice mono culture which decrease soil fertility
Mr krabs went to the store
Answer:
yes he did
Explanation:
maybe
Answer:
and got money
Explanation:
A plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident caused by the defendant. The plaintiff sued the defendant for his injuries. In preparation for trial, the plaintiff's attorney hired a doctor to examine the plaintiff. At trial, the defense attorney attempts to call the doctor as a witness to testify about statements the plaintiff made in confidence to the doctor about his injuries, which the doctor then communicated to the plaintiff's attorney. The state recognizes only the common law privileges. Should this testimony be admitted
Answer:
Yes! The Courtroom is the only place where the "Doctor/Patient Confidentiality" does not uphold.
what is Employment equity act?
Employment eguity act is the act that states that each person whether male or female shall get equal opportunity to do work according to their knowledge and each individual shall get equal salary according to their job...........
cho ví dụ về truyền thống dựng nước đi đôi vs giữ nc của tổ tiên
Answer:
bonjour a toi désolé je ne peux pas maintenir
Explanation:
pa cerveau moins
If it is it the state who is targeting a group of people, what recourse do they have to achieve justice?
Answer:
Going to the supreme court.
Explanation:
If the state who is targeting a group of people, they have to achieve justice by going to the high court first or supreme court because supreme court has the authority to resolve disputes between two groups on the basis of justice. The supreme court has the authority to stop the state from targeting the specific group of people so the people has the option to go to the court for achieving justice.
The table below lists sources of law.
Sources of Law
Statutes and Acts
Ordinance
?
Which phrase completes the table?
Criminal law
Case law
Military law
Juvenile law
Answer:
military law
Explanation:
tell me I'm right
True or false: Work zone speed limits are enforced even when no work is underway.
20
It's true that work zone speed limits are enforced even when no work is underway. Thus, option A is correct.
What are speed limits?Speed limits are there set to enforce that the speed of the vehicle should be according to the prescribed speed limit. the limit is decided by the transportation federation, and they can set the limits according to the road and the way. the speed can be different for highways, city roads, and freeways. The speed limit can be different depending on the vehicle, i.e, different for cars, trucks, and Scotty.
Work zone speed limits are enforced even when no work is underway because maybe there is some construction work left or the construction things are kept there. It can also be that is the specified limit of speed in itself only. Therefore, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about speed limits, here:
https://brainly.com/question/5559383
#SPJ2
When he turned 21, a young man who lived in State A decided to move to a city in State B. He loaded all his possessions in his truck and trailer and set out for State B. While en route, he was involved in a serious accident in State C with a woman driving an SUV, injuring both parties. Because of his injuries, the man has remained in State C for several months. However, he still intends to relocate to the city in State B as soon as he has recuperated and is able to travel. The woman, a citizen and resident of State D, is preparing to file a negligence action in federal district court against the man for the injuries she suffered in the State C accident. If the woman files the action before the man proceeds to State B, in what federal district or districts is venue proper
Answer: The District of State C and the District of State A.
Explanation:
The federal district or districts whereby the venue is proper is the District of State C and the District of State A. It should be noted that the federal venue in a civil action will be proper in the district whereby part of the events brought about the claim that occurred.
In this case, the proper venue is the District of State C as a substantial part of the events brought about the claim that occurred there. Also, during the time that the accident took place, the domicile of the man was in State A.
Tyler, a citizen of Utah, files a lawsuit in federal court against MegaCorp. Tyler's claim is based upon a violation of federal law. The federal district court has original jurisdiction, which means that Group of answer choices federal cases usually originate in federal district courts. the court has unusual procedural rules. the court has a unique method of deciding whether to hear a case. the subject matter of the suit is interesting and new.
Answer:
Because the Federal District Court has original jurisdiction, it can choose to take the case or not. It takes precedence over all.
Due to its initial jurisdiction, the Federal District Court has the option of taking the case or not. It has precedence over everything.
What is a federal court?District courts, which are the trial court, circuit courts, which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the ultimate level of appeal in the federal system, are the three primary levels of the federal court system. In the entire nation, there are 94 district courts, 13 circuit courts, and one Supreme Court.
Because federal courts only have limited jurisdiction, they can only consider matters that are specifically allowed by the US Constitution or federal law. Original jurisdiction is the term used to describe this form of authority.
The authority of state courts and federal courts may overlap, allowing some matters to be brought in both courts. In the beginning, the plaintiff gets to decide whether to file the action in a state or federal court.
Learn more about federal courts, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1384353
#SPJ2
mention a short description of make an observation , ask a question , do a background resaerch related to scientific learning .
Answer:
Explanation:
Israeli lawyer Moshe Strugano (Attorney - Moshe Strugano and Co Law firm), an expert in the “formation of offshore companies" says, observation refers to something, which we have learned by watching or checking out something and continuously thinking about it. When a person is making an observation, he is simply making a comment about something or someone, generally depends on someone's behaviour.
